Prevalence of type 2 diabetes in South Africa : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pheiffer, Carmen
dc.contributor.author Pillay-van Wyk, Victoria
dc.contributor.author Turawa, Eunice
dc.contributor.author Levitt, Naomi
dc.contributor.author Kengne, Andre P.
dc.contributor.author Bradshaw, Debbie
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-07T14:50:37Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-07T14:50:37Z
dc.date.issued 2021-05-30
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL : Table S1: PRISMA 2009 Checklist. Table S2: PubMed search strategy. Table S3: Quality assessment criteria for prevalence studies. Table S4: Prevalence of T2DM in South Africans aged 25 years and older. Table S5: Prevalence of IGT, IFG and undiagnosed T2DM in South Africans aged 25 years and older. Table S6: Level of evidence as qualified with GRADE. Figure S1: Funnel plot of included studies. en_ZA
dc.description.abstract Synthesis of existing prevalence data using rigorous systematic review methods is considered an effective strategy to generate representative and robust prevalence figures to inform health planning and policy. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify, collate, and synthesise all studies reporting the prevalence of total and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in South Africa. Four databases, PubMed, Scopus,Web of Science, and African Index Medicus were searched for articles published between January 1997 and June 2020. A total of 1886 articles were identified, of which 11 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence in individuals 25 years and older was 15.25% (11.07–19.95%) for T2DM, 9.59% (5.82–14.17%) for IGT, 3.55% (0.38–9.61%) for IFG, and 8.29% (4.97–12.34%) for newly diagnosed T2DM. Although our pooled estimate may be imprecise due to significant heterogeneity across studies with regard to population group, age, gender, setting, diagnostic test, and study design, we provide evidence that the burden of glucose intolerance in South Africa is high. These factors contribute to the paucity of representative T2DM prevalence data. There is a need for well-designed epidemiological studies that use best-practice and standardised methods to assess prevalence. en_ZA
dc.description.department Obstetrics and Gynaecology en_ZA
dc.description.librarian am2022 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The South African Medical Research Council en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Pheiffer, C.; Pillay-van Wyk, V.; Turawa, E.; Levitt, N.; Kengne, A.P.; Bradshaw, D. Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes in South Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18, 5868. https://DOI.org/ 10.3390/ijerph18115868. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1660-4601 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3390/ijerph18115868
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/84828
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher MDPI Publishing en_ZA
dc.rights © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. en_ZA
dc.subject Prevalence en_ZA
dc.subject Newly diagnosed diabetes en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.subject Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) en_ZA
dc.subject Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) en_ZA
dc.subject Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) en_ZA
dc.title Prevalence of type 2 diabetes in South Africa : a systematic review and meta-analysis en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record