The evaluation of animal bite treatment centers in the Philippines from a patient perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Amparo, Anna Charinna B.
dc.contributor.author Jayme, Sarah I.
dc.contributor.author Roces, Maria Concepcion R.
dc.contributor.author Quizon, Maria Consorcia L.
dc.contributor.author Mercado, Maria Luisa L.
dc.contributor.author Dela Cruz, Maria Pinky Z.
dc.contributor.author Licuan, Dianne A.
dc.contributor.author Villalon, Ernesto E. S.
dc.contributor.author Baquilod, Mario S.
dc.contributor.author Hernandez, Leda M.
dc.contributor.author Taylor, Louise H.
dc.contributor.author Nel, Louis Hendrik
dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-21T12:47:14Z
dc.date.available 2019-10-21T12:47:14Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-26
dc.description S1 Checklist. STROBE checklist. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s001 en_ZA
dc.description S1 Fig. Locations of ABTCs in (A) Nueva Vizcaya, (B) Palawan, and (C) Tarlac. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s002 en_ZA
dc.description S1 Table. Number of animal bites and scratches recorded by community surveys by province and by year. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s003 en_ZA
dc.description S2 Table. Additional reasons given in the community survey for not seeking medical treatment for wounds. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s004 en_ZA
dc.description S3 Table. Reasons for patients not completing the PEP series. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s005 en_ZA
dc.description S4 Table. Total Out-of-Pocket Expenses, ABTC patient survey, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s006 en_ZA
dc.description S5 Table. Biting animal status at day 28 follow-up. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s007 en_ZA
dc.description S6 Table. PEP completion status of patients bitten by animals that died or were of unknown status. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873.s008 en_ZA
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: The Philippines has built an extensive decentralised network of Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to help bite victims receive timely rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) at little cost. This study surveyed patients in the community and at ABTCs of three provinces to assess animal bite/scratch incidence, health-seeking behaviour and PEP-related out-of pocket expenses (OOPE). METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: During community surveys in 90 barangays (neighbourhoods), 53% of households reported at least one animal bite /scratch injury over the past 3 years, similar across urban and rural barangays. Overall bite/scratch incidences in 2016-17 were 67.3, 41.9 and 48.8 per 1,000 population per year for Nueva Vizcaya, Palawan and Tarlac respectively. Incidences were around 50% higher amongst those under 15 years of age, compared to -those older than 15. Household awareness of the nearest ABTCs was generally over 80%, but only 44.9% sought proper medical treatment and traditional remedies were still frequently used. The proportion of patients seeking PEP was not related to the distance or travel time to the nearest ABTC. For those that did not seek medical treatment, most cited a lack of awareness or insufficient funds and almost a third visited a traditional healer. No deaths from bite/scratch injuries were reported. A cohort of 1,105 patients were interviewed at six ABTCs in early 2017. OOPE varied across the ABTCs, from 5.53 USD to 37.83 USD per patient, primarily dependent on the need to pay for immunization if government supplies had run out. Overall, 78% of patients completed the recommended course, and the main reason for non-completion was a lack of time, followed by insufficient funds. Dog observation data revealed that 85% of patients were not truly exposed to rabies, and education in bite prevention might reduce provoked bites and demand for PEP. An accompanying paper details the ABTC network from the health provider's perspective. en_ZA
dc.description.department Veterinary Tropical Diseases en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (Belgium) en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.plosone.org en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Amparo ACB, Jayme SI, Roces MCR, Quizon MCL, Mercado MLL, Dela Cruz MPZ, et al. (2018) The evaluation of Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a patient perspective. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0200873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200873. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1371/journal.pone.0200873
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/71888
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Public Library of Science en_ZA
dc.rights © 2018 Amparo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. en_ZA
dc.subject Animal bite treatment centers (ABTC) en_ZA
dc.subject Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) en_ZA
dc.subject Philippine standard geographic code en_ZA
dc.subject Out-of pocket expenses (OOPE) en_ZA
dc.title The evaluation of animal bite treatment centers in the Philippines from a patient perspective en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record