S1 Fig. Map with locations of the rainfall stations and the sampled herds.
S2 Fig. Regression between fraction HBC among BTB-negative females and BTB prevalence
per herd.
S1 Table. Logistic regression southern females with body condition status as dependent
variable (highest ranking model).
S2 Table. Logistic regression southern males with body condition status as dependent variable
(highest ranking model).
S3 Table. Logistic regression southern females with BTB status as dependent variable
(highest ranking model).
S4 Table. Logistic regression southern males with BTB status as dependent variable (highest
ranking model).
S5 Table. Logistic regression northern females with body condition status as dependent
variable (highest ranking model).
S6 Table. Logistic regression southern males with BTB status as dependent variable (Evidence
Ratio = 1.9).
S7 Table. Logistic regression northern males with body condition status as dependent variable
(Evidence Ratio = 2.1).
S8 Table. Significance of the genetic-measure by annual-rainfall interaction per single
year.
S9 Table. Logistic regression northern females with body condition status as dependent
variable (Evidence Ratio = 1.8).
S10 Table. Results Hedges' g analyses (group differences with respect to MDLmale and
MDLfemale).
S1 Text. Consistency of the model outcomes.