Diagnosis of food allergy : history, examination and in vivo and in vitro tests

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van der Spuy, D.A.
dc.contributor.author Terblanche, Alta J.
dc.contributor.author Karabus, S.
dc.contributor.author Kriel, M.
dc.contributor.author Manjra, Ahmed I.
dc.contributor.author Goddard, E.
dc.contributor.author Gray, Claudia L.
dc.contributor.author Lang, A.C.
dc.contributor.author Risenga, Samuel Malamulele
dc.contributor.author Levin, M.E.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-24T10:03:27Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-24T10:03:27Z
dc.date.issued 2015-01
dc.description.abstract One cannot depend on one single test to diagnose food allergy. A detailed history is an essential initial step in cases of suspected food allergy. Aspects of the history should be gathered separately for each food being considered, as a patient may experience different types of reactions with various foods, each of which requires individual diagnostic and management strategies. History alone is not diagnostic and additional measures of sensitisation or food challenges are often required. In suspected immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy, skin-prick tests (SPTs) and/or measurement of serum specific IgE antibodies (ImmunoCAP) to suspected foods is used to prove sensitisation. Sensitisation does not, however, confirm clinical food allergy as these tests indicate an immunological response to the specific allergen, but the diagnosis requires a clear correlation between the test result and clinical reaction (by positive history or food challenge). The magnitude of the test result (SPT mean wheal size or ImmunoCAP level in kU/L) correlates with the likelihood of clinical allergy, but not the severity of a reaction. Choice of the allergens tested should be guided by the history, but limited to the lowest necessary number to avoid false-positive results. Tests for sensitisation to foods should not be performed when the history indicates that such foods are tolerated. Ninety-five per cent positive predictive values (where a clinical reaction can be predicted in 95% of cases) have been described for immediate reactions, but may be population specific. There are no validated tests to confirm non-IgE- or mixed IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies. Diagnosis of this group of allergies depends on elimination of the suspected food, clearance of symptoms, and recurrence of symptoms on re-introduction of the food. en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hb2015 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.samj.org.za en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Van der Spuy, DA, Terblanche, AJ, Karabus, S, Kriel, M, Manjra, AI, Goddard, E, Gray, CL, Lang, AC, Risenga, SM & Levin, ME 2015, 'Diagnosis of food allergy : history, examination and in vivo and in vitro tests', South African Medical Journal, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 69-70. l en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 0256-9574 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 2078-5135 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.7196/SAMJ.9100
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/43805
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Health and Medical Publishing Group en_ZA
dc.rights © 2015 Health & Medical Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 3.0). en_ZA
dc.subject Diagnosis en_ZA
dc.subject Food allergy en_ZA
dc.subject History en_ZA
dc.subject Examination en_ZA
dc.subject In vivo tests en_ZA
dc.subject In vitro tests en_ZA
dc.title Diagnosis of food allergy : history, examination and in vivo and in vitro tests en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record