Rationality is dead! Long live rationality! Saving rational basis review

dc.contributor.author	Bishop, Michael
dc.date.accessioned	2011-10-03T07:17:39Z
dc.date.available	2011-10-03T07:17:39Z
dc.date.issued	2010
dc.description.abstract	Rational basis review has been in trouble for a while. For at least the past 35 years it has been constantly criticised for being 'empty', 'toothless', inconsistent and incoherent. Despite its doubtful pedigree, litigants continue to rely on it and the courts refuse to alter the test to answer their critics. This essay is one more in a long lineage of attempts to figure out what is wrong with rational basis review and propose a way forward.	en
dc.identifier.citation	Bishop, M 2010, 'Rationality is dead! Long live rationality! Saving rational basis review', SA Publiekreg/SA Public Law, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 312-345.	en
dc.identifier.issn	0258-6568
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17391
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	The Verloren van Themaat Centre for Public Law Studies, UNISA	en_US
dc.rights	The Verloren van Themaat Centre for Public Law Studies, UNISA	en
dc.subject	Rationality	en
dc.subject	Rational basis review	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Critical theory	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Court rules	en
dc.subject.lcsh	Judgments	en
dc.title	Rationality is dead! Long live rationality! Saving rational basis review	en
dc.type	Article	en

Files in this item

Name: Bishop_Rationalit ...

Size: 193.4Kb

Format: PDF

Description: Article