Rational basis review has been in trouble for a while. For at least the past 35 years it has been constantly criticised for being 'empty', 'toothless', inconsistent and incoherent. Despite its doubtful pedigree, litigants continue to rely on it and the courts refuse to alter the test to answer their critics. This essay is one more in a long lineage of attempts to figure out what is wrong with rational basis review and propose a way forward.
Mpanza, Thamsanqa Doctor Empire; Hassen, Abubeker(Springer, 2015-10)
The inclusion of Stylosanthes scabra cv. Seca
forage in the total mixed ration (TMR) as partial replacement
of lucerne (alfalfa) was evaluated for its effects
on voluntary feed intake, nutrient digestibility and
The study investigates the factors which contribute to low levels of preservation of retirement funds when individuals change jobs. A conceptual model of factors that drive low preservation levels is developed and reveals ...
Prozesky, Leon; Fourie, Nicole; Bastianello, Stella S.; Nel, P.W.; Kellerman, T. Stephanus; Verwoerd, Daniel Wynand(Published by the Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute., 1991)
The epidemiological, clinical and clinical pathological findings in 20 cattle and 4 sheep from 15 outbreaks of poultry litter toxicity in South Africa over the past 6 years are documented. In 6 outbreaks, the litter emanated ...