The evaluation of operating animal bite treatment centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective

dc.contributor.authorAmparo, Anna Charinna B.
dc.contributor.authorJayme, Sarah I.
dc.contributor.authorRoces, Maria Concepcion R.
dc.contributor.authorQuizon, Maria Consorcia L.
dc.contributor.authorErnesto E. S., Villalon III
dc.contributor.authorQuiambao, Beatriz P.
dc.contributor.authorBaquilod, Mario S.
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Leda M.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Louise H.
dc.contributor.authorNel, Louis Hendrik
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-16T08:52:11Z
dc.date.available2018-11-16T08:52:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-12
dc.descriptionS1 Fig. Recent case incidence (2014±16) vs (A) ABTC density and (B) human population density for provinces.en_ZA
dc.descriptionS2 Fig. Mean ±SE of recent case incidence for municipalities by income class.en_ZA
dc.descriptionS1 Table. (A) Documents and datasets reviewed and (B) Key informant interviews conducted to understand the operation of ABTCs in the Philippines.en_ZA
dc.descriptionS2 Table. ABTCs and rabies deaths per province, based on national data.en_ZA
dc.descriptionS3 Table. Summary of ABTC operational costs and funders for study ABTCs in 2016.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : The Philippine government has an extensive network of 513 Animal Bite Treatment Centers (ABTCs) to supply rabies post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), reaching over 1 million bite victims in 2016. The network was evaluated using a review of existing national and provincial data, key informant interviews and surveys in sample ABTCs to determine the cost-effectiveness of this network in preventing human rabies deaths. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS : One urban and one rural ABTC in each of three selected provinces were studied in more detail. PEP delivery generally followed national guidance based on best practices, but there was evidence of operational challenges in supplying all ABTCs with adequate biologics and recently trained staff. Funding was contributed by different levels of government and in some clinics, patients paid for a significant fraction of the total cost. From a health provider perspective including both fixed and variable costs, the average PEP course delivered cost USD 32.91 /patient across urban ABTCs (with higher patient throughput) and USD 57.21 /patient across rural ABTCs. These costs suggests that PEP provision in the Philippines cost USD 37.6 million in 2016, with a cost per life saved of USD 8,290. An analysis of the 2,239 suspected rabies deaths from 2008 to 2016 showed no significant decline, and from 2014–16 an average of 8,534 years of life were lost annually. The incidence of rabies deaths from 2014–16 was not clearly related to the provision of ABTCs (per 100,000 population) or human population density, but deaths were more common in higher income provinces. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE : In the context of comprehensive rabies control (including dog vaccination and public awareness) ways to reduce this high expenditure on PEP should be explored, to most cost-effectively reach the elimination of human rabies deaths. This paper is accompanied by another containing data on the operation of ABTCs network from a patient perspective.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2018en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Global Alliance for Rabies Control (USA) received funds from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (Belgium) to undertake the study. ACBA, SIJ, LHT, MCR, and MCLQ were funded proportionate to their time spent on the study.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.plosone.orgen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationAmparo ACB, Jayme SI, Roces MCR, Quizon MCL, Villalon EES, III, Quiambao BP, et al. (2018) The evaluation of operating Animal Bite Treatment Centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspective. PLoS ONE 13(7): e0199186. https://DOI.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0199186.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0199186
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/67279
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_ZA
dc.rights© 2018 Amparo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_ZA
dc.subjectPhilippine governmenten_ZA
dc.subjectNetworken_ZA
dc.subjectAnimal bite treatment center (ABTC)en_ZA
dc.subjectPost exposure prophylaxis (PEP)en_ZA
dc.subjectRabies vaccineen_ZA
dc.subjectCost effectiveness analysisen_ZA
dc.subjectEvidence based medicineen_ZA
dc.subjectHealth care costen_ZA
dc.subjectHealth care personnelen_ZA
dc.subjectIncidenceen_ZA
dc.titleThe evaluation of operating animal bite treatment centers in the Philippines from a health provider perspectiveen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 5 of 6
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amparo_Evaluation_2018.pdf
Size:
4.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amparo_EvaluationFigS1_2018.tif
Size:
2.26 MB
Format:
Tag Image File Format
Description:
Figure S1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amparo_EvaluationFigS2_2018.tif
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Tag Image File Format
Description:
Figure S2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amparo_EvaluationTabS1_2018.docx
Size:
16.02 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Table S1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amparo_EvaluationTabS2_2018.docx
Size:
23.3 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Table S2

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: