The effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union players

dc.contributor.authorLeduc, Cedric
dc.contributor.authorWeaving, Dan
dc.contributor.authorOwen, Cameron
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Lopez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorChantler, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorAloulou, Anis
dc.contributor.authorTee, Jason C.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Ben
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T11:38:27Z
dc.date.available2022-11-07T11:38:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-18
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : Elite rugby players experience poor sleep quality and quantity. This lack of sleep could compromise post-exercise recovery. Therefore, it appears central to encourage sleep in order to improve recovery kinetics. However, the effectiveness of an acute ergogenic strategy such as sleep extension on recovery has yet to be investigated among athletes. AIM : To compare the effects of a single night of sleep extension to an active recovery session (CON) on post-exercise recovery kinetics. METHODS : In a randomised cross-over design, 10 male rugby union players participated in two evening training sessions (19:30) involving collision activity, 7-days apart. After each session, participants either extended their sleep to 10 hours or attended an early morning recovery session (07:30). Prior to (PRE), immediately after (POST 0 hour [h]), 14h (POST 14) and 36h (POST 36) post training, neuromuscular, perceptual and cognitive measures of fatigue were assessed. Objective sleep parameters were monitored two days before the training session and over the two-day recovery period. RESULTS : The training session induced substantial decreases in countermovement jump mean power and wellness across all time points, while heart rate recovery decreased at POST 0 in both conditions. Sleep extension resulted in greater total sleep time (effect size [90% confidence interval]: 5.35 [4.56 to 6.14]) but greater sleep fragmentation than CON (2.85 [2.00 to 3.70]). Between group differences highlight a faster recovery of cognitive performance following sleep extension (-1.53 [-2.33 to -0.74]) at POST 14, while autonomic function (-1.00 [-1.85 to -0.16]) and upper-body neuromuscular function (-0.78 [-1.65 to 0.08]) were better in CON. However, no difference in recovery status between groups was observed at POST 36. CONCLUSION : The main finding of this study suggests that sleep extension could affect cognitive function positively but did not improve neuromuscular function the day after a late exercise bout.en_US
dc.description.departmentPhysiologyen_US
dc.description.librariandm2022en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.plosone.orgen_US
dc.identifier.citationLeduc, C., Weaving, D., Owen, C., Ramirez-Lopez, C., Chantler, S., Aloulou, A. et al. (2022) The effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union players. PLoS One 17(8): e0273026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273026.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0273026
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88170
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2022 Leduc et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectSportsen_US
dc.subjectMaterial fatigueen_US
dc.subjectRunningen_US
dc.subjectHeart rateen_US
dc.subjectFatigueen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectStroop testen_US
dc.subjectActive recovery sessionen_US
dc.subjectRugby playersen_US
dc.subjectSleep quality and quantityen_US
dc.subjectLack of sleepen_US
dc.subjectPost-exercise recoveryen_US
dc.subjectRecovery kineticsen_US
dc.subjectSleep extensionen_US
dc.titleThe effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union playersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leduc_Effect_2022.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leduc_EffectDataS1_2022.xlsx
Size:
93.12 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Data S1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leduc_EffectDataS2_2022.xlsx
Size:
55.93 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Data S2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leduc_EffectDataS3_2022.xlsx
Size:
107.27 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Data S3

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: