The effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union players

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Leduc, Cedric
Weaving, Dan
Owen, Cameron
Ramirez-Lopez, Carlos
Chantler, Sarah
Aloulou, Anis
Tee, Jason C.
Jones, Ben

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND : Elite rugby players experience poor sleep quality and quantity. This lack of sleep could compromise post-exercise recovery. Therefore, it appears central to encourage sleep in order to improve recovery kinetics. However, the effectiveness of an acute ergogenic strategy such as sleep extension on recovery has yet to be investigated among athletes. AIM : To compare the effects of a single night of sleep extension to an active recovery session (CON) on post-exercise recovery kinetics. METHODS : In a randomised cross-over design, 10 male rugby union players participated in two evening training sessions (19:30) involving collision activity, 7-days apart. After each session, participants either extended their sleep to 10 hours or attended an early morning recovery session (07:30). Prior to (PRE), immediately after (POST 0 hour [h]), 14h (POST 14) and 36h (POST 36) post training, neuromuscular, perceptual and cognitive measures of fatigue were assessed. Objective sleep parameters were monitored two days before the training session and over the two-day recovery period. RESULTS : The training session induced substantial decreases in countermovement jump mean power and wellness across all time points, while heart rate recovery decreased at POST 0 in both conditions. Sleep extension resulted in greater total sleep time (effect size [90% confidence interval]: 5.35 [4.56 to 6.14]) but greater sleep fragmentation than CON (2.85 [2.00 to 3.70]). Between group differences highlight a faster recovery of cognitive performance following sleep extension (-1.53 [-2.33 to -0.74]) at POST 14, while autonomic function (-1.00 [-1.85 to -0.16]) and upper-body neuromuscular function (-0.78 [-1.65 to 0.08]) were better in CON. However, no difference in recovery status between groups was observed at POST 36. CONCLUSION : The main finding of this study suggests that sleep extension could affect cognitive function positively but did not improve neuromuscular function the day after a late exercise bout.

Description

Keywords

Sports, Material fatigue, Running, Heart rate, Fatigue, Perception, Stroop test, Active recovery session, Rugby players, Sleep quality and quantity, Lack of sleep, Post-exercise recovery, Recovery kinetics, Sleep extension

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Leduc, C., Weaving, D., Owen, C., Ramirez-Lopez, C., Chantler, S., Aloulou, A. et al. (2022) The effect of acute sleep extension vs active recovery on post exercise recovery kinetics in rugby union players. PLoS One 17(8): e0273026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273026.