Rapid assessment of two primary health clinics : are we ready for National Health Insurance?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Motsepe, A.
dc.contributor.author Wolvaardt, Jacqueline Elizabeth (Liz)
dc.contributor.author Webb, Elizabeth M.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-24T08:46:58Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-24T08:46:58Z
dc.date.issued 2020-03
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND. Healthcare service delivery remains a challenge in most primary healthcare (PHC) facilities across South Africa (SA). In addition, the healthcare system continues to have high and rising costs, with widening gaps in quality, equity and access. The National Department of Health (NDoH) launched the National Health Insurance (NHI) pilot programme in 2012 as the solution to the current ailing health system. The NDoH’s strategy is to improve all PHC facilities to meet the standards of an ‘ideal clinic’ (IC) in order to improve access to quality health services. OBJECTIVES. To assess the challenges experienced by two NHI pilot clinics in the provision of healthcare. METHODS. A descriptive cross-sectional study was done in a province in SA, at two NHI pilot clinics. Data were collected using structured questionnaires that used the component elements of the IC model framework. Data were captured in Excel, and analysed using Stata 13 software. RESULTS. Forty-six clinical and administrative staff participated in the study. The majority (84%, n=38) of participants were female. Clinic A had not been designated as an IC. There was no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the two clinics in their global self-scoring regarding service provision. Human resources and medicine supply shortages were reported as challenges affecting service provision. All (100%, n=22) clinic A participants reported not having a doctor, while 82% (n=18) reported not having a pharmacist. Clinic B had IC status, and all the participants (100%, n=24) confirmed the availability of the doctor, while 88% (n=21) reported the availability of a pharmacist. The clinics reported a range of 5 - 180 minutes of patient waiting time after triaging; however, there was no statistically significant difference found in the patient waiting times between the two clinics (p=0.96). CONCLUSION. Both clinics are NHI pilot clinics, yet there are reported disparities regarding the equity of resources, which could affect effective service provision. Both clinics should have been operating at a similar standard under the NHI pilot programme. en_ZA
dc.description.department School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH) en_ZA
dc.description.librarian hj2021 en_ZA
dc.description.uri http://www.shsjournal.org/index.php/shsj en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Motsepe, A., Wolvaardt, J.E. and Webb, E.M. 2020, 'Rapid Assessment of Two Primary Health Clinics : Are We Ready for National Health Insurance?', Southern African Journal of Public Health, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–26. doi: 10.7196/SHS.2020.v4.i1.109. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2312-9360
dc.identifier.other 10.7196/SHS.2020.v4.i1.109
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/81458
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Health and Medical Publishing Group en_ZA
dc.rights © 2020, Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG) en_ZA
dc.subject South Africa (SA) en_ZA
dc.subject Healthcare service delivery en_ZA
dc.subject Primary healthcare (PHC) en_ZA
dc.subject National Health Insurance (NHI) en_ZA
dc.subject National Department of Health (NDoH) en_ZA
dc.title Rapid assessment of two primary health clinics : are we ready for National Health Insurance? en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record