Effects of chemical and mechanical stimulation on laryngeal motion during alfaxalone, thiopentone or propofol anaesthesia in healthy dogs

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Labuscagne, Sandra
dc.contributor.author Zeiler, Gareth Edward
dc.contributor.author Dzikiti, Brighton T.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-16T07:40:22Z
dc.date.issued 2019-07
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE : To compare the effect of chemical and mechanical stimulation on arytenoid cartilage motion during anaesthetic induction with alfaxalone, thiopentone or propofol. STUDY DESIGN : Masked, randomized, crossover study. ANIMALS : A group of eight adult Beagle dogs. METHODS : Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone (7.5 mg kg–1), propofol (3 mg kg–1) or alfaxalone (1.5 mg kg–1) intravenously (IV), which were concurrently paired with either chemical (doxapram at 2.5 mg kg–1 IV) or mechanical (gentle pressure to the corniculate process of the right arytenoid cartilage using a cotton bud) stimulation for enhanced assessment of laryngeal motion, in random order, with a 1 week wash-out period between treatments. If deemed inadequately anaesthetized, supplemental boli of thiopentone (1.8 mg kg–1), propofol (0.75 mg kg–1) or alfaxalone (0.4 mg kg–1) were administered. Assessment of number of arytenoid motions and vital breaths, among others, was initiated immediately after induction. Chemical (doxapram) and mechanical stimulation were begun 2 minutes after anaesthetic induction. Data were collected at 2, 3 and 5 minutes after anaesthetic induction and the Friedman rank-sum or repeated-measures analysis of variance tests were used when applicable for statistical analysis. RESULTS : The duration of examination time was shorter among treatments combined with chemical stimulation (p=0.001). Examination time during induction was longer for alfaxalone-chemical (8.9 minutes) and -mechanical (10.9 minutes) compared to both induction with thiopentone-chemical (3.8 minutes) and propofol-chemical (4.0 minutes). The median number of arytenoid motions for both thiopentone (67) and propofol (59) induction combined with chemical stimulation was significantly higher in comparison to that of alfaxalone (1), thiopentone (2) and propofol (2), when combined with mechanical stimulation at 3 minutes after induction. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE : Among the regimens for assessing laryngeal motion assessed in the present study, combinations of thiopentone or propofol with doxapram are the most effective means of stimulating arytenoid motion and could improve the accuracy of diagnosis of laryngeal paralysis in dogs. en_ZA
dc.description.department Companion Animal Clinical Studies en_ZA
dc.description.embargo 2020-07-01
dc.description.librarian hj2020 en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorship The National Research Foundation of South Africa en_ZA
dc.description.uri https://www.journals.elsevier.com/veterinary-anaesthesia-and-analgesia en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Labuscagne, S., Zeiler, G.E. & Dzikiti, B.T. 2019, 'Effects of chemical and mechanical stimulation on laryngeal motion during alfaxalone, thiopentone or propofol anaesthesia in healthy dogs', Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 435-442. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 1467-2987 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1467-2995 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1016/j.vaa.2018.12.010
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/73757
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Elsevier en_ZA
dc.rights © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 435-442, 2019. doi :10.1016/j.vaa.2018.12.010. en_ZA
dc.subject Alfaxalone en_ZA
dc.subject Chemical stimulation en_ZA
dc.subject Laryngeal paralysis en_ZA
dc.subject Mechanical stimulation en_ZA
dc.subject Propofol en_ZA
dc.subject Thiopentone en_ZA
dc.subject Dogs (Canis familiaris) en_ZA
dc.title Effects of chemical and mechanical stimulation on laryngeal motion during alfaxalone, thiopentone or propofol anaesthesia in healthy dogs en_ZA
dc.type Postprint Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record