Conscientious objection to abortion and accommodating women's reproductive health rights: reflections on a decision of the Constitutional Court of Colombia from an African regional human rights perspective
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Conscientious objection to abortion and accommodating women's reproductive health rights: reflections on a decision of the Constitutional Court of Colombia from an African regional human rights perspective
If applied in isolation from the fundamental rights of women seeking abortion services,
the right to conscientious objection can render any given rights to abortion
illusory, including the rights to health, life, equality and dignity that are attendant
to abortion. A transformative understanding of human rights requires that the
right to conscientious objection to abortion be construed in a manner that is subject
to the correlative duties which are imposed on the conscientious objector, as well as
the state, in order to accommodate women’s reproductive health rights. In recent
years, the Colombian Constitutional Court has been giving a judicial lead on the
development of a right to conscientious objection that accommodates women’s
fundamental rights. This article reflects on one of the court’s decisions and draws
lessons for the African region.