Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed : a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bergman, Åke
dc.contributor.author Andersson, Anna-Maria
dc.contributor.author Becher, Georg
dc.contributor.author Van den Berg, Martin
dc.contributor.author Blumberg, Bruce
dc.contributor.author Bjerregaard, Poul
dc.contributor.author Bornehag, Carl-Gustav
dc.contributor.author Bornman, Maria S. (Riana)
dc.contributor.author Brandt, Ingvar
dc.contributor.author Brian, Jayne V.
dc.contributor.author Casey, Stephanie C.
dc.contributor.author Fowler, Paul A.
dc.contributor.author Frouin, Heloise
dc.contributor.author Giudice, Linda C.
dc.contributor.author Iguchi, Taisen
dc.contributor.author Hass, Ulla
dc.contributor.author Jobling, Susan
dc.contributor.author Juul, Anders
dc.contributor.author Kidd, Karen A.
dc.contributor.author Kortenkamp, Andreas
dc.contributor.author Lind, Monica
dc.contributor.author Martin, Olwenn V.
dc.contributor.author Muir, Derek
dc.contributor.author Ochieng, Roseline
dc.contributor.author Olea, Nicolas
dc.contributor.author Norrgren, Leif
dc.contributor.author Ropstad, Erik
dc.contributor.author Ross, Peter S.
dc.contributor.author Ruden, Christina
dc.contributor.author Scheringer, Martin
dc.contributor.author Skakkebaek, Niels Erik
dc.contributor.author Soder, Olle
dc.contributor.author Sonnenschein, Carlos
dc.contributor.author Soto, Ana
dc.contributor.author Swan, Shanna
dc.contributor.author Toppari, Jorma
dc.contributor.author Tyler, Charles R.
dc.contributor.author Vandenberg, Laura N.
dc.contributor.author Vinggaard, Anne Marie
dc.contributor.author Wiberg, Karin
dc.contributor.author Zoeller, R. Thomas
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-11T06:50:03Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-11T06:50:03Z
dc.date.issued 2013-08-27
dc.description.abstract The “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors regarding proposed European Union endocrine disrupter regulations ignores scientific evidence and well-established principles of chemical risk assessment. In this commentary, endocrine disrupter experts express their concerns about a recently published, and is in our considered opinion inaccurate and factually incorrect, editorial that has appeared in several journals in toxicology. Some of the shortcomings of the editorial are discussed in detail. We call for a better founded scientific debate which may help to overcome a polarisation of views detrimental to reaching a consensus about scientific foundations for endocrine disrupter regulation in the EU. en_US
dc.description.librarian am2014 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Stockholm University en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.ehjournal.net/content/12/1/69 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bergman et al.: Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors. Environmental Health 2013 12:69. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1476-069X
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1476-069X-12-69
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/40104
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.rights © 2013 Bergman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License en_US
dc.subject Endocrine disrupting chemicals en_US
dc.subject Environment en_US
dc.subject Health en_US
dc.subject Precautionary principle en_US
dc.subject Regulatory toxicology en_US
dc.title Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed : a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record