dc.contributor.author |
Hurst, Zachary M.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
McCleery, Robert A.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Collier, Bret A.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fletcher, Robert J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Silvy, Nova J.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Taylor, P.J. (Peter John)
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Monadjem, Ara
|
|
dc.contributor.editor |
Fenton, Brock |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-11-25T07:37:12Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-11-25T07:37:12Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013-09-09 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Across the planet, high-intensity farming has transformed native vegetation into monocultures, decreasing biodiversity on a
landscape scale. Yet landscape-scale changes to biodiversity and community structure often emerge from processes
operating at local scales. One common process that can explain changes in biodiversity and community structure is the
creation of abrupt habitat edges, which, in turn, generate edge effects. Such effects, while incredibly common, can be highly
variable across space and time; however, we currently lack a general analytical framework that can adequately capture such
spatio-temporal variability. We extend previous approaches for estimating edge effects to a non-linear mixed modeling
framework that captures such spatio-temporal heterogeneity and apply it to understand how agricultural land-uses alter
wildlife communities. We trapped small mammals along a conservation-agriculture land-use interface extending 375 m into
sugarcane plantations and conservation land-uses at three sites during dry and wet seasons in Swaziland, Africa. Sugarcane
plantations had significant reductions in species richness and heterogeneity, and showed an increase in community
similarity, suggesting a more homogenized small mammal community. Furthermore, our modeling framework identified
strong variation in edge effects on communities across sites and seasons. Using small mammals as an indicator, intensive
agricultural practices appear to create high-density communities of generalist species while isolating interior species in less
than 225 m. These results illustrate how agricultural land-use can reduce diversity across the landscape and that effects can
be masked or magnified, depending on local conditions. Taken together, our results emphasize the need to create or retain
natural habitat features in agricultural mosaics. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Zoology and Entomology |
|
dc.description.department |
Mammal Research Institute |
|
dc.description.librarian |
am2013 |
en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship |
Texas A&M Agrilife Research |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.plosone.org |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Hurst ZM, McCleery RA, Collier BA, Fletcher RJ Jr, Silvy NJ, et al. (2013) Dynamic Edge Effects in Small Mammal Communities across a Conservation-Agricultural Interface in Swaziland. PLoS ONE 8(9): e74520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074520 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1932-6203 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1371/journal.pone.0074520 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32592 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Public Library of Science |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2013 Hurst et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Small mammal communities |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Conservation-agriculture land-use interface |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Edge effects on communities |
en_US |
dc.title |
Dynamic edge effects in small mammal communities across a conservation-agricultural interface in Swaziland |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |