Assessment of service quality of public antiretroviral treatment (ART) clinics in South Africa: a cross-sectional study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kinkel, Hans-Friedemann
dc.contributor.author Adelekan, Adeboye Mutiu
dc.contributor.author Marcus, Tessa S.
dc.contributor.author Wolvaardt, Gustaaf
dc.date.accessioned 2012-10-19T11:55:41Z
dc.date.available 2012-10-19T11:55:41Z
dc.date.issued 2012-07-31
dc.description HFK conceptualized and designed this study, performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. AMA participated in the design of the study, coordinated the participant observers (recruitment, training, sending out and debriefing), collected and captured the data and participated in the performance of statistical analyses and interpretation of the data. TSM has helped to draft the manuscript and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. GW conceptualized the study, participated in the design and has revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and commented on drafts of the article and approved the final version. en_US
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND In South Africa the ever increasing demand for antiretroviral treatment (ART) runs the risk of leading to sub-optimal care in public sector ART clinics that are overburdened and under resourced. This study assessed the quality of ART services to identify service areas that require improvement. METHODS A cross-sectional study was carried out at 16 of 17 public ART clinics in the target area in greater Pretoria, South Africa. Trained participant observers presented as ART qualifying HIV positive patients that required a visit to assess treatment readiness. They evaluated each facility on five different occasions between June and November 2009, assessing the time it took to get an appointment, the services available and accessed, service quality and the duration of the visit. Services (reception area, clinician’s consultation, HIV counselling, pharmacy, nutrition counselling and social worker’s assessment) were assessed against performance standards that apply to all clinics. Service quality was expressed as scores for clinic performance (CPS) and service performance (SPS), defined as the percentage of performance standards met per clinic and service area. RESULTS In most of the clinics (62.5 %) participant observers were able to obtain an appointment within one week, although on the day of their visit essential services could not always be accessed. The median CPS of the assessed facilities was 68.5 with four clinics not meeting minimum standards (CPS > 60). The service areas that performed least well were the clinician’s consultation (SPS 67.3) and HIV counselling (SPS 70.7). Most notably, clinicians performed a physical examination in only 41.1 % of the visits and rarely did a complete TB symptom screening. Counsellors frequently failed to address prevention of HIV transmission. CONCLUSIONS Overall public sector ART clinics in greater Pretoria were easily accessible and their services were of an acceptable quality. However, the time spent at the clinic to complete the services was found to be very long and there was considerable variation in adherence to performance standards within the services, particularly in respect of clinician’s consultation and counselling. Clinic management needs to ensure efficient clinic organisation and to improve adherence to performance standards in key service areas. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship We would like to acknowledge the participant observers for their time and effort they have spent to collected the data at the clinics. This study, conducted by the HIV & TB Medicine Unit (HTMU), collaboration of Foundation for Professional Development (FPD) and the University of Pretoria, has been realised utilising USAID/PEPFAR funds. FPD is one of the main recipients of USAID/PEPFAR funding in South Africa to support the South African public sector ART programme. This study was part of FPD’s routine monitoring and evaluation procedures and no specific research funding has been utilised. None of the authors received specific funding for this research. en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/228 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Kinkel, HF, Adelakan, AM, Marcus, TS & Wolvaardt, G 2012, 'Assessment of service quality of public antiretroviral treatment (ART) clinics in South Africa: a cross-sectional study', BMC Health Services Research, vol. 12, no. 228, pp. 1-22. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6963
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1472-6963-12-228
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20243
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BioMed Central en_US
dc.rights © 2012 Kinkel et al. ; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License en_US
dc.subject Clinics en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Antiretroviral agents -- South Africa en
dc.title Assessment of service quality of public antiretroviral treatment (ART) clinics in South Africa: a cross-sectional study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record