Speech recognition in noise and temporal resolution abilities of formally trained musicians

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Pottas, Lidia
dc.contributor.coadvisor Soer, Maggi E. (Magdalena Elizabeth)
dc.contributor.coadvisor De Sousa, Karina C.
dc.contributor.postgraduate Schoeman, Michele Nicole
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-23T06:34:51Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-23T06:34:51Z
dc.date.created 2023-04-24
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description Dissertation (MA (Audiology))--University of Pretoria, 2022. en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: It has often been reported that musicians may have an advantage, or a ‘musician advantage’, to perceive speech in the presence of background noise. Musicians may also have improved central auditory processing skills, which may assist in better speech recognition in noise, however contradicting research has found no musician advantage in speech recognition in noise. Aim: The aim of the current study was to compare the temporal resolution and speech recognition in noise abilities between musicians and non-musicians with normal hearing sensitivity (PTA of  15 dB HL). Method: In this quantitative cross-sectional comparative group research study forty participants’ conventional and extended high-frequency pure tone thresholds were determined using the hearTest™. The Digits-in-Noise (DIN) test was used to evaluate speech recognition in two different listening conditions, namely homophasic and antiphasic. Temporal resolution was tested using the Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) test. A binaural intelligibility-level difference (BILD) was calculated by using the two values obtained in the homophasic and antiphasic recognition in noise listening conditions. Results: There were no differences between the groups in EHF thresholds, DIN SNR values and BILD SNR values, as well as the GIN approximate thresholds. Musicians presented with slightly better performances, however not significant (p > .05), in the GIN and DIN tests. Conclusion: This study could not find significant differences in the specified auditory performances between musicians and non-musicians. The musician group, however, performed slightly better, although not significantly different, across all tests, except with the BILD results. The non-musician group performed better, although not significantly better, in the BILD test. The results of this study suggest longitudinal research in order to shed more light on discrepancies in literature. Keywords: musicians; temporal resolution; speech recognition in noise; extended high frequencies en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree MA (Audiology) en_US
dc.description.department Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.22129412 en_US
dc.identifier.other A2023 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89774
dc.identifier.uri DOI: https://doi.org/10.25403/UPresearchdata.22129412.v1
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Musicians en_US
dc.subject Non-musicians en_US
dc.subject Temporal resolution en_US
dc.subject Speech recognition in noise en_US
dc.subject Extended high frequency en_US
dc.subject Gaps in noise en_US
dc.subject Digits in noise en_US
dc.subject Homophasic en_US
dc.subject Antiphasic en_US
dc.title Speech recognition in noise and temporal resolution abilities of formally trained musicians en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record