Economic impact assessment of sustainable management options of the elephant population in the Kruger Trans-frontier Park

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Breitenbach, M.C. (Marthinus)
dc.contributor.author Fenyes, T.I. (Tamas Imre)
dc.contributor.author Meyer, Nicolaas G.
dc.contributor.author Louw, Daniel B.
dc.date.accessioned 2008-12-01T13:20:39Z
dc.date.available 2008-12-01T13:20:39Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.description.abstract The elephant population in the Kruger Trans-frontier Park is currently seen by many nature conservationists as beyond sustainable levels. Wild-life supporters are of the view that the elephant population should be sustained. Ecologists warn that over-population of the elephant population is putting too much stress on the environment, which may make it impossible to sustain other plant and wild life forms in the long run. The paper has as its main aim to evaluate Environmental (Ecological), Cultural, Economic and Social dimensions of sustainability using Economic Impact Analysis to appraise different options of managing the elephant population in the Kruger Trans-frontier Park. The authors believe that this research would contribute greatly to the debate in other parts of the world. If not managed properly, an overpopulation of elephants often leads to environmental degradation. Such degradation could lead to a loss in ecosystem function (indirect use value), which not only implies a loss in ecosystem productivity and resilience, but also the need for ecosystem restoration. The sometimes irreversible damage, such as the extinction of other animal and plant species caused as a result of overpopulation of elephant, is a direct cost to the environment and society. This cost is not reflected in, for example, the value an international tourist derives from viewing elephants in the park or protected area where the damage-causing specie lives. Studies undertaken thus far, are mainly based on an economic valuation of the elephant in relation to economic variables that are quantifiable, and also mainly under very limited assumptions. These are but some of the important issues considered in this paper in order to derive Best-Practice appraisal methodology. Although the authors suggest a cost-benefit analysis, it only offers very limited appraisal and the authors therefore argue in favor of a much more rigorous partial equilibrium analysis. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Breitenbach, MC, Fenyes, TI, Meyer, NG & Louw, DB 2008, 'Economic impact assessment of sustainable management options of the elephant population in the Kruger Trans-frontier Park', International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 57-70. [http://iji.cgpublisher.com/] en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1832-2077
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/8160
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Common Ground en_US
dc.rights Common Ground en_US
dc.subject Ecological management en_US
dc.subject Elephant management en_US
dc.subject Partial equilibrium model en_US
dc.subject Linear programming en_US
dc.subject Sustainable ecological management options en_US
dc.subject Environmental operations research en_US
dc.subject Cost-benefit analysis en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Elephants -- Management en
dc.subject.lcsh Environmental management -- Cost effectiveness en
dc.title Economic impact assessment of sustainable management options of the elephant population in the Kruger Trans-frontier Park en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record