dc.contributor.author |
Slater, Paul
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
McCance, Tanya
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
McCormack, Brendan
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-02-08T08:56:43Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-08 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
OBJECTIVE : The aim of the study was to develop and test an instrument, underpinned by a recognized theoretical framework, that examines how staff perceive person-centred practice, using proven methods of instrument design and psychometric analysis.
DESIGN : The study used a mixed method multiphase research design involving: two Delphi studies to agree definitions and items to measure the constructs aligned to the person-centred practice theoretical framework (Phase 1); and a large-scale quantitative cross-sectional survey (Phase 2).
SETTING : Phase 1 was an international study involving representatives from seven countries across Europe and Australia, with Phase 2 conducted in one country across five organizations.
PARTICIPANTS : Two international panels of experts (n = 33) in person-centred practice took part in the Delphi study and a randomly selected sample of registered nurses (n = 703, 23.8%) drawn from across a wide range of clinical settings completed the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : The main outcome is to establish a measure of staff perceptions of person-centred Practice.
RESULTS : Broad consensus on definitions relating to 17 constructs drawn from a person-centred practice framework was achieved after two rounds; likewise with the generation of 108 items to measure the constructs; a final instrument comprising 59 items with proven psychometric properties was achieved.
CONCLUSIONS : The PCPI-S is psychometrically acceptable instrument validated by an international expert panel that maps specifically to a theoretical framework for person-centred practice and provides a generic measure of person-centredness. |
en_ZA |
dc.description.department |
Nursing Science |
en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo |
2018-08-01 |
|
dc.description.librarian |
hj2018 |
en_ZA |
dc.description.uri |
https://academic.oup.com/intqhc |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation |
Slater, P., McCance, T. & McCormack, B. 2017, 'The development and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S)', International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 541–547, https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx066. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1353-4505 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1464-3677 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1093/intqhc/mzx066 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/63895 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
Oxford University Press |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in International Journal for Quality in Health Care following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is : 'The development and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S)', International Journal for Quality in Health Care, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 541–547, 2017, doi : https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx066, is available online at : https://academic.oup.com/intqhc. |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Factor analysis |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Delphi technique |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Psychometrics |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Instrument design |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Person-centred |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Consensus |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Maps |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Participation in ward rounds |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Outcome measures |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Perception |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Nurses |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Demography |
en_ZA |
dc.subject |
Australia |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
The development and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory – Staff (PCPI-S) |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_ZA |