Abstract:
Important work for Information Science and Information Services has been done by two internationally renowned
intellectuals, Edgar Morin and Michel Serres. Their relevance relates to the fact that they both accept the challenge of
the complex reality of the world. They work out ways to deal with the dynamics of these issues in the most significant way
possible. They both have special methods of including information as central to their work, despite their disciplinary
backgrounds and engagements. This fact gave me the freedom to expect from their work, given their enthusiasm about
the central place of information in society and life, to provide significant insights to us in our own situation. We encounter
the problem that our standard, accepted methods cannot really help us here. These methods are still based on “a flat
world assumption” as are our policies, strategies and skills – all of which are based on a deterministic approach and a
cause-effect strategy. As such, it cannot give account of the words dynamic, restless and complex. This system is simply
too movable and fluctuating. There are too many dimensions. We need more, even more than reason alone. We have to
move beyond method, beyond mere rationality, in order to cope and get real access and develop understanding. We need
to move into another dimension, and onto a totally new level, of reality and into a different dimension or mode of thought
– into another domain, the domain of ideas rather than problems. We have to start thinking differently. What I am trying
to sketch and that is referred to here, in line with Edgar Morin’s suggestions, is noology, or “the science of the knowing
mind” with its focus on the fullness and complexity of reality. The mode of thought that can effectively cope with this vast
and complex challenge is what Michel Serres calls our “multiple, connective intellection” that can penetrate all the
respective areas and establish links between them. If we are serious about these challenges and want to explore this
“restless dynamic system” in its full complexity we can hardly do better than look in more detail at the work done by
Edgar Morin and Michel Serres.
