Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Idowu, O.A.
dc.contributor.author Lorentz, Simon A.
dc.contributor.author Annandale, John George
dc.contributor.author Aken, Mark Ernest
dc.contributor.author McCartney, M.P.
dc.contributor.author Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C.
dc.contributor.author Westhuizen, A.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-27T06:48:42Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-27T06:48:42Z
dc.date.issued 2010-10
dc.description.abstract The ACRU agrohydrological model, in the form of ACRU2000 and its salinity module, ACRUSalinity, was employed in catchment-scale assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed (un-mined) and rehabilitated soils in the Upper Olifants basin of South Africa. The study area comprised a small catchment of 4.7 km2 located in a coal-mine environment, known as the Tweefontein Pan catchment. The catchment drained to a surface reservoir (Tweefontein Reservoir) of maximum capacity and surface area 4 000 Mℓ and 1.5 km2, respectively. The catchment was instrumented to measure hydrodynamic responses and simulated as a hydrological system. Consideration was given to runoff, groundwater storage, evapotranspiration, baseflow, interception, irrigation water supply and rainfall, thereby accounting for all the dominant hydrological components of the system. Three scenarios were simulated using the available records for 5 years (1999 to 2004). The first was a baseline scenario representing the prevailing condition in the study area and the other 2 scenarios represented widespread irrigation with the mine-water on undisturbed and rehabilitated soils. In simulating the widespread irrigation on rehabilitated soils, a distinction was made between a rehabilitated irrigated area before and after the re-establishment of the equilibrium water table. Comparison of the results from the simulated scenarios indicated that a greater undisturbed area (max of 160 ha) than rehabilitated area (max of 120 ha) could be irrigated with mine-water from the Tweefontein Reservoir. Irrigation on rehabilitated soils depleted the water in the reservoir more rapidly than irrigation on undisturbed soils, due to lower runoff and higher ingress to groundwater in rehabilitated areas. en
dc.identifier.citation Idowu, OA, Lorentz, SA, Annandale, JG, Aken, M, McCartney, MP, Thornton-Dibb, SLC & Westhuizen, A 2010, 'Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model', Water SA, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 543-552. [http://www.wrc.org.za] en
dc.identifier.issn 0378-4738
dc.identifier.issn 1816-7950 (online)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/15778
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Water Research Council en_US
dc.rights Water Research Council en_US
dc.subject Widespread irrigation en
dc.subject Mined land irrigation en
dc.subject ACRU2000 en
dc.subject.lcsh Mine water -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basin en
dc.subject.lcsh Irrigation projects -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basin en
dc.subject.lcsh Hydrological surveys -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basin en
dc.subject.lcsh Water salinization -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basin en
dc.title Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record