Does allelopathy explain the invasiveness of Campuloclinium macrocephalum (pompom weed) in the South African grassland biome?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Goodall, Jeremy
dc.contributor.author Witkowski, Ed T.F.
dc.contributor.author Ammann, Sigrun
dc.contributor.author Reinhardt, Carl Frederick (Charlie)
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-31T06:52:08Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-31T06:52:08Z
dc.date.issued 2010-10
dc.description.abstract Campuloclinium macrocephalum is an Asteraceous alien weed that invades roadside vegetation and grassland in South Africa. The role of allelopathy and competition in its invasiveness was investigated using Eragrostis curvula (weeping lovegrass, an indigenous grass), E. tef and Lactuca sativa (lettuce) as test species. Trials were conducted in Petri-dishes, pots and in the field. Root and shoot extracts of adult C. macrocephalum plants did not inhibit seed germination in any test species. The greatest effect was radicle stunting produced by leaf extracts at 10 and 25% w/v. Eragrostis curvula was less tolerant of the extracts than E. tef. Allelopathic effects could however not be confirmed in pot trials evaluating the interference potential of the weed or weed residue effects against E. curvula. E. curvula growth and biomass was not affected by plant densities of one or five C. macrocephalum per pot, whereas C. macrocephalum suffered a 17% mortality and density-dependant trade-offs of size and biomass for survival. Under field conditions C. macrocephalum had a broader ecological niche than E. curvula, invading hygrophilous and undisturbed grasslands not amenable for E. curvula establishment, this included well drained disturbed soils on which the latter proliferated. Evidence of competitive exclusion of E. curvula by C. macrocephalum or vice versa was not detected. The coexistence of both species irrespective of relative density suggested these species have different resource requirements. Allelopathy was not an adequate causal mechanism to explain invasiveness in Campuloclinium macrocephalum. A more traditional hypothesis such as the absence of natural enemies, at this stage, better justifies the weed’s invasion success. en
dc.identifier.citation Goodall, J, Witkowski, ETF, Ammann, S & Reinhardt, C 2010, 'Does allelopathy explain the invasiveness of Campuloclinium macrocephalum (pompom weed) in the South African grassland biome?', Biological Invasions, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3497-3512, DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9747-2 doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9747-2. en
dc.identifier.issn 1387-3547
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s10530-010-9747-2
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/14161
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.rights Springer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com en_US
dc.subject Density dependence en
dc.subject In vitro assays en
dc.subject Pot trials en
dc.subject Grassland belt transects en
dc.subject.lcsh Allelopathy -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Biotic communities -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Alien plants -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Roadside plants -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Grassland plants -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Plant competition -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Weeping lovegrass -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Teff -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Lettuce -- South Africa en
dc.title Does allelopathy explain the invasiveness of Campuloclinium macrocephalum (pompom weed) in the South African grassland biome? en
dc.type Postprint Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record