Allopatric speciation in ticks : genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Labruna, Marcelo B.
dc.contributor.author Naranjo, Victoria
dc.contributor.author Mangold, Atilio J.
dc.contributor.author Thompson, Carolina
dc.contributor.author Estrada-Pena, Agustín
dc.contributor.author Guglielmone, Alberto A.
dc.contributor.author Jongejan, Frans
dc.contributor.author De la Fuente, Jose
dc.date.accessioned 2009-12-07T11:23:18Z
dc.date.available 2009-12-07T11:23:18Z
dc.date.issued 2009-02
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: The cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, economically impact cattle industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. The morphological and genetic differences among R. microplus strains have been documented in the literature, suggesting that biogeographical and ecological separation may have resulted in boophilid ticks from America/Africa and those from Australia being different species. To test the hypothesis of the presence of different boophilid species, herein we performed a series of experiments to characterize the reproductive performance of crosses between R. microplus from Australia, Africa and America and the genetic diversity of strains from Australia, Asia, Africa and America. RESULTS: The results showed that the crosses between Australian and Argentinean or Mozambican strains of boophilid ticks are infertile while crosses between Argentinean and Mozambican strains are fertile. These results showed that tick strains from Africa (Mozambique) and America (Argentina) are the same species, while ticks from Australia may actually represent a separate species. The genetic analysis of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA and microsatellite loci were not conclusive when taken separately, but provided evidence that Australian tick strains were genetically different from Asian, African and American strains. CONCLUSION: The results reported herein support the hypothesis that at least two different species share the name R. microplus. These species could be redefined as R. microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (for American and African strains) and probably the old R. australis Fuller, 1899 (for Australian strains), which needs to be redescribed. However, experiments with a larger number of tick strains from different geographic locations are needed to corroborate these results. en
dc.identifier.citation Labruna, MB, Naranjo, V, Mangold, AJ, Thompson, C, Estrada-Pena, A, Guglielmone, AA, Jongejan, F & De La Fuente, J 2009, 'Allopatric speciation in ticks : genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus', BMC Evolutionary Biology, vol. 9, no. 46. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcevolbiol/] en
dc.identifier.issn 1471-2148
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1471-2148-9-46
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/12295
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher BioMed Central en
dc.relation.requires Adobe Acrobat Reader en
dc.rights © 2009 Labruna et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. en
dc.subject Allopatric speciation en
dc.subject Reproductive divergence en
dc.subject Geographic strains en
dc.subject.lcsh Ticks en
dc.subject.lcsh Rhipicephalus en
dc.title Allopatric speciation in ticks : genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record