Vaccination with recombinant Boophilus annulatus Bm86 ortholog protein, Ba86, protects cattle against B. annulatus and B. microplus infestations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Canales, Mario
dc.contributor.author Almazan, Consuelo
dc.contributor.author Naranjo, Victoria
dc.contributor.author Jongejan, Frans
dc.contributor.author De la Fuente, Jose
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-22T06:28:11Z
dc.date.available 2009-09-22T06:28:11Z
dc.date.issued 2009-03
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: The cattle ticks, Boophilus spp., affect cattle production in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Tick vaccines constitute a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to tick control. The recombinant B. microplus Bm86 protective antigen has been shown to protect cattle against tick infestations. Recently, the gene coding for B. annulatus Bm86 ortholog, Ba86, was cloned and the recombinant protein was secreted and purified from the yeast Pichia pastoris. RESULTS: Recombinant Ba86 (Israel strain) was used to immunize cattle to test its efficacy for the control of B. annulatus (Mercedes, Texas, USA strain) and B. microplus (Susceptible, Mexico strain) infestations. Bm86 (Gavac and Mozambique strain) and adjuvant/saline were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Vaccination with Ba86 reduced tick infestations (71% and 40%), weight (8% and 15%), oviposition (22% and 5%) and egg fertility (25% and 50%) for B. annulatus and B. microplus, respectively. The efficacy of both Ba86 and Bm86 was higher for B. annulatus than for B. microplus. The efficacy of Ba86 was higher for B. annulatus (83.0%) than for B. microplus (71.5%). The efficacy of Bm86 (Gavac; 85.2%) but not Bm86 (Mozambique strain; 70.4%) was higher than that of Ba86 (71.5%) on B. microplus. However, the efficacy of Bm86 (both Gavac and Mozambique strain; 99.6%) was higher than that of Ba86 (83.0%) on B. annulatus. CONCLUSION: These experiments showed the efficacy of recombinant Ba86 for the control of B. annulatus and B. microplus infestations in cattle and suggested that physiological differences between B. microplus and B. annulatus and those encoded in the sequence of Bm86 orthologs may be responsible for the differences in susceptibility of these tick species to Bm86 vaccines. en
dc.identifier.citation Canales, M, Almazan, C, Naranjo, V, Jongejan, F & De la Fuente, J 2009, 'Vaccination with recombinant Boophilus annulatus Bm86 ortholog protein, Ba86, protects cattle against B. annulatus and B. microplus infestations', BMC Biotechnology, vol. 9, no. 29, pp. 1-8. [http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcbiotechnol/] en
dc.identifier.issn 1472-6750
dc.identifier.other 10.1186/1472-6750-9-29
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/11338
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher BioMed Central en
dc.relation.requires Adobe Acrobat Reader en
dc.rights © 2009 Canales et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. en
dc.subject Vaccination en
dc.subject Boophilus annulatus en
dc.subject.lcsh Boophilus en
dc.subject.lcsh Cattle -- Parasites en
dc.subject.lcsh Cattle tick en
dc.subject.lcsh Cattle -- Vaccination en
dc.title Vaccination with recombinant Boophilus annulatus Bm86 ortholog protein, Ba86, protects cattle against B. annulatus and B. microplus infestations en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record