Comparative genomic analysis of Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius strains with distinct hydrogenogenic capacities
Loading...
Date
Authors
Mohr, Teresa
Aliyu, Habibu
Kuchlin, Raphael
Zwick, Michaela
Cowan, Don A.
Neumann, Anke
De Maayer, Pieter
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BioMed Central
Abstract
BACKGROUND : The facultatively anaerobic thermophile Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius produces hydrogen gas
(H2) by coupling CO oxidation to proton reduction in the water-gas shift (WGS) reaction via a carbon monoxide
dehydrogenase–hydrogenase enzyme complex. Although little is known about the hydrogenogenic capacities of
different strains of this species, these organisms offer a potentially viable process for the synthesis of this alternative
energy source.
RESULTS : The WGS-catalyzed H2 production capacities of four distinct P. thermoglucosidasius strains were determined
by cultivation and gas analysis. Three strains (DSM 2542T, DSM 2543 and DSM 6285) were hydrogenogenic, while
the fourth strain (DSM 21625) was not. Furthermore, in one strain (DSM 6285) H2 production commenced earlier in
the cultivation than the other hydrogenogenic strains. Comparative genomic analysis of the four strains identified
extensive differences in the protein complement encoded on the genomes, some of which are postulated to
contribute to the different hydrogenogenic capacities of the strains. Furthermore, polymorphisms and deletions in
the CODH-NiFe hydrogenase loci may also contribute towards this variable phenotype.
CONCLUSIONS : Disparities in the hydrogenogenic capacities of different P. thermoglucosidasius strains were identified,
which may be correlated to variability in their global proteomes and genetic differences in their CODH-NiFe hydrogenase
loci. The data from this study may contribute towards an improved understanding of WGS-catalysed hydrogenogenesis
by P. thermoglucosidasius.
Description
Additional file 1: Growth curve and gas composition during the
cultivation of P. thermoglucosidasius), DSM 2542T (A), DSM 2543 (B) and
DSM 6285 (C), DSM 21625 (D). All strains were cultivated in quadruplicate
in mLB medium with an initial gas atmosphere consisting of 50% CO and
50% air for 84 h.
Additional file 2: Genomic relatedness among the four compared P. thermoglucosidasius strains. Calculation of the digital DNA-DNA hybridization (GGDC) [19] and OrthoANI [20] values for each paired combination of strains. The GGDC are the bottom and the OrthoANI the top values.
Additional file 3: Annotations of the protein families shared and unique among the compared P. thermoglucosidasius strains. The protein family datasets which are shared between different combinations of the four compared strains or unique to a particular strain were functionally annotated by RAST [36], comparison against the Conserved Domain Database [37] and classification according to their COG function using EggNOG mapper [36]. The proportions (%) of proteins (unique to strains or shared among different combinations of strains) belonging to each COG are graphically presented.
Additional file 4: SNPs occurring in the CODH-NiFe group 4a locus genes of the compared P. thermoglucosidasius strains. The number of SNPs occurring in the individual CODH-NiFe group 4a genes of particular strains are indicated. The number in brackets indicates the number of non-synonymous amino acid substitutions observed in the amino acid sequence alignments for each individual gene.
Additional file 2: Genomic relatedness among the four compared P. thermoglucosidasius strains. Calculation of the digital DNA-DNA hybridization (GGDC) [19] and OrthoANI [20] values for each paired combination of strains. The GGDC are the bottom and the OrthoANI the top values.
Additional file 3: Annotations of the protein families shared and unique among the compared P. thermoglucosidasius strains. The protein family datasets which are shared between different combinations of the four compared strains or unique to a particular strain were functionally annotated by RAST [36], comparison against the Conserved Domain Database [37] and classification according to their COG function using EggNOG mapper [36]. The proportions (%) of proteins (unique to strains or shared among different combinations of strains) belonging to each COG are graphically presented.
Additional file 4: SNPs occurring in the CODH-NiFe group 4a locus genes of the compared P. thermoglucosidasius strains. The number of SNPs occurring in the individual CODH-NiFe group 4a genes of particular strains are indicated. The number in brackets indicates the number of non-synonymous amino acid substitutions observed in the amino acid sequence alignments for each individual gene.
Keywords
Biohydrogen production, Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius, Comparative genomics, DSM 6285, Water-gas shift (WGS)
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Mohr, T., Aliyu, H., Küchlin, R. et al. 2018, 'Comparative genomic analysis of Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius strains with distinct hydrogenogenic capacities', BMC Genomics, vol. 19, art. 880, pp. 1-10.
