The ebb and flow of the application of the principle of subsidiarity – critical reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts
dc.contributor.author | Murcott, Melanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Van der Westhuizen, Werner | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-03T08:07:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-03T08:07:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.description.abstract | Under the current constitutional dispensation the judiciary is not only constitutionally authorised, but also constitutionally obliged, to oversee exercises of public power; including the conduct of the executive.1 It does so through judicial review. In judicial review proceedings, courts must follow a principled and justified approach to choosing the appropriate standards on a possible ‘continuum of constitutional accountability’ against which impugned exercises of public power should be measured. This is what is demanded by the separationof- powers doctrine: courts ought not to invoke legal norms formalistically or arbitrarily when reviewing public power. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Public Law | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2018 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | https://journals.co.za/content/journal/jlc_conrev1 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Murcott, M. & Van der Westthuizen, W. 2017, 'The ebb and flow of the application of the principle of subsidiarity – critical reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts', Constitutional Court Review, vol. 7, pp. 43-67. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | "2073-6215 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/66070 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Juta Law | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Judiciary | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Public power | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Executive | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Judicial review | en_ZA |
dc.title | The ebb and flow of the application of the principle of subsidiarity – critical reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |