The ebb and flow of the application of the principle of subsidiarity – critical reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Murcott, Melanie
Van der Westhuizen, Werner

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Juta Law

Abstract

Under the current constitutional dispensation the judiciary is not only constitutionally authorised, but also constitutionally obliged, to oversee exercises of public power; including the conduct of the executive.1 It does so through judicial review. In judicial review proceedings, courts must follow a principled and justified approach to choosing the appropriate standards on a possible ‘continuum of constitutional accountability’ against which impugned exercises of public power should be measured. This is what is demanded by the separationof- powers doctrine: courts ought not to invoke legal norms formalistically or arbitrarily when reviewing public power.

Description

Keywords

Judiciary, Public power, Executive, Judicial review

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Murcott, M. & Van der Westthuizen, W. 2017, 'The ebb and flow of the application of the principle of subsidiarity – critical reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts', Constitutional Court Review, vol. 7, pp. 43-67.