The ebb and flow of the application of the principle of subsidiarity – critical reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts
Loading...
Date
Authors
Murcott, Melanie
Van der Westhuizen, Werner
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Juta Law
Abstract
Under the current constitutional dispensation the judiciary is not only
constitutionally authorised, but also constitutionally obliged, to oversee exercises
of public power; including the conduct of the executive.1 It does so through
judicial review. In judicial review proceedings, courts must follow a principled
and justified approach to choosing the appropriate standards on a possible
‘continuum of constitutional accountability’ against which impugned exercises of
public power should be measured. This is what is demanded by the separationof-
powers doctrine: courts ought not to invoke legal norms formalistically or
arbitrarily when reviewing public power.
Description
Keywords
Judiciary, Public power, Executive, Judicial review
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Murcott, M. & Van der Westthuizen, W. 2017, 'The ebb and flow of the application of the principle of subsidiarity – critical reflections on Motau and My Vote Counts', Constitutional Court Review, vol. 7, pp. 43-67.