Tissue-specific localization of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from camels in Kenya : insights into vector competence

dc.contributor.authorKhogali, Rua
dc.contributor.authorBastos, Armanda D.S.
dc.contributor.authorBargul, Joel L.
dc.contributor.authorGetange, Dennis
dc.contributor.authorKabii, James
dc.contributor.authorMasiga, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorVillinger, Jandouwe
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-10T04:38:21Z
dc.date.available2024-12-10T04:38:21Z
dc.date.issued2024-04
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR138025-OR138032, https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR136390-OR136395, https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR123453-OR123456, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR136355-OR136357, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR136371-OR136378, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, OR130207- OR130215.en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Tick-borne pathogen (TBP) surveillance studies often use whole-tick homogenates when inferring tick-pathogen associations. However, localized TBP infections within tick tissues (saliva, hemolymph, salivary glands, and midgut) can inform pathogen transmission mechanisms and are key to disentangling pathogen detection from vector competence. METHODS: We screened 278 camel blood samples and 504 tick tissue samples derived from 126 camel ticks sampled in two Kenyan counties (Laikipia and Marsabit) for Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, Coxiella, Rickettsia, Theileria, and Babesia by PCR-HRM analysis. RESULTS: Candidatus Anaplasma camelii infections were common in camels (91%), but absent in all samples from Rhipicephalus pulchellus, Amblyomma gemma, Hyalomma dromedarii, and Hyalomma rufipes ticks. We detected Ehrlichia ruminantium in all tissues of the four tick species, but Rickettsia aeschlimannii was only found in Hy. rufipes (all tissues). Rickettsia africae was highest in Am. gemma (62.5%), mainly in the hemolymph (45%) and less frequently in the midgut (27.5%) and lowest in Rh. pulchellus (29.4%), where midgut and hemolymph detection rates were 17.6% and 11.8%, respectively. Similarly, in Hy. dromedarii, R. africae was mainly detected in the midgut (41.7%) but was absent in the hemolymph. Rickettsia africae was not detected in Hy. rufipes. No Coxiella, Theileria, or Babesia spp. were detected in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The tissue-specific localization of R. africae, found mainly in the hemolymph of Am. gemma, is congruent with the role of this tick species as its transmission vector. Thus, occurrence of TBPs in the hemolymph could serve as a predictor of vector competence of TBP transmission, especially in comparison to detection rates in the midgut, from which they must cross tissue barriers to effectively replicate and disseminate across tick tissues. Further studies should focus on exploring the distribution of TBPs within tick tissues to enhance knowledge of TBP epidemiology and to distinguish competent vectors from dead-end hosts.en_US
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-15:Life on landen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, and the Government of the Republic of Kenya, the icipe ARPPIS-DAAD scholarship and a UP post-graduate bursary.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citationKhogali, R., Bastos, A., Bargul, J.L., Getange, D., Kabii, J., Masiga, D. & Villinger, J. (2024) Tissue-specific localization of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from camels in Kenya: insights into vector competence. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 14:1382228. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1382228en_US
dc.identifier.issn2235-2988 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3389/fcimb.2024.1382228
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/99825
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Khogali, Bastos, Bargul, Getange, Kabii, Masiga and Villinger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).en_US
dc.subjectDromedary camelsen_US
dc.subjectTick tissuesen_US
dc.subjectRhipicephalus pulchellusen_US
dc.subjectAmblyomma gemmaen_US
dc.subjectHyalomma dromedariien_US
dc.subjectHyalomma rufipesen_US
dc.subjectEhrlichiaen_US
dc.subjectRickettsiaen_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.subjectSDG-15: Life on landen_US
dc.titleTissue-specific localization of tick-borne pathogens in ticks collected from camels in Kenya : insights into vector competenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Khogali_TissueSpecific_2024.pdf
Size:
2.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Khogali_TissueSpecificSuppl_2024.DOCX
Size:
673.14 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Supplemental Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: