Validating a project life-cycle review framework for mining projects at Exxaro

dc.contributor.authorSteenkamp, J.R.
dc.contributor.authorBekker, M.C. (Michiel Christiaan)
dc.contributor.emailmichiel.bekker@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-30T07:19:46Z
dc.date.available2018-08-30T07:19:46Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-31
dc.description.abstractIndependent formal reviews against validated project frameworks aim to ensure that pre-specified phase deliverables are completed and validated before the next project phase begins. Through various internal initiatives, Exxaro established a project framework to develop and implement capital projects. However, to date, this framework has not been validated. The intent of this research was, through a case study approach, to validate the project framework for Exxaro (a holistic case). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with sixteen key role players across the organisation on four different projects (embedded cases). Results from the embedded cases were compared to identify common themes emerging from the research. Although the research identified areas for improvement for certain aspects of the framework, the common themes correspond with the main aspects of the proposed framework, thus validating the framework.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractOnafhanklike formele hersienings gemeet teen ’n gevalideerde raamwerk verseker dat uitkomste bereik word volgens vooraf gedefinieerde doelwitte, voordat die volgende projekfase mag begin. Deur verskeie interne inisiatiewe is ’n projekraamwerk ontwikkel vir die ontwikkeling en implementering van kapitaal projekte in die Exxaro omgewing. Maar, hierdie projekraamwerk was tevore nog nie gevalideer nie. Hierdie navorsing het gestreef om deur ’n gevallestudie benadering die projekraamwerk te valideer vir Exxaro projekte (’n holistiese geval). Semi-gestruktureerde onderhoude is met sestien sleutelrolspelers van regoor die organisasie gevoer oor vier verskillende projekte (ingeslote gevalle). Onderhoudresultate van die ingeslote gevalle studies is vergelyk om gemeenskaplike temas te identifiseer waarvolgens die raamwerk verbeter kan word. Die gemeenskaplike temas stem ooreen met die hoof aspekte van die voorgestelde raamwerk, en daarom kan die raamwerk as gevalideer beskou word.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentGraduate School of Technology Management (GSTM)en_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2018en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://sajie.journals.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationSteenkamp, J.R. & Bekker, M.C. 2018, 'Validating a project life-cycle review framework for mining projects at Exxaro', South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 74-85.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1012-277X (print)
dc.identifier.issn2224-7890 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.7166/29-1-1711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/66373
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSouthern African Institute for Industrial Engineeringen_ZA
dc.rights© 2018, South African Institute of Industrial Engineering. All rights reserved. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.en_ZA
dc.subjectExxaroen_ZA
dc.subjectCapital projectsen_ZA
dc.subjectProject frameworken_ZA
dc.subjectAres of improvementen_ZA
dc.titleValidating a project life-cycle review framework for mining projects at Exxaroen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Steenkamp_Validating_2018.pdf
Size:
503.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: