Canopy distribution and microclimate preferences of sterile and wild Queensland fruit flies

dc.contributor.authorInskeep, Jess R.
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Andrew P.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Phillip W.
dc.contributor.authorRempoulakis, Polychronis
dc.contributor.authorWeldon, Christopher William
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T05:08:57Z
dc.date.available2022-06-21T05:08:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractInsects tend to live within well-defned habitats, and at smaller scales can have distinct microhabitat preferences. These preferences are important, but often overlooked, in applications of the sterile insect technique. Diferent microhabitat preferences of sterile and wild insects may refect diferences in environmental tolerance and may lead to spatial separation in the feld, both of which may reduce the control program efciency. In this study, we compared the diurnal microhabitat distributions of mass-reared (fertile and sterile) and wild Queensland fruit fies, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Flies were individually tagged and released into feld cages containing citrus trees. We recorded their locations in the canopies (height from ground, distance from canopy center), behavior (resting, grooming, walking, feeding), and the abiotic conditions on occupied leaves (temperature, humidity, light intensity) throughout the day. Flies from all groups moved lower in the canopy when temperature and light intensity were high, and humidity was low; lower canopy regions provided shelter from these conditions. Fertile and sterile mass-reared fies of both sexes were generally lower in the canopies than wild fies. Flies generally fed from the top sides of leaves that were lower in the canopy, suggesting food sources in these locations. Our observations suggest that mass-reared and wild B. tryoni occupy diferent locations in tree canopies, which could indicate diferent tolerances to environmental extremes and may result in spatial separation of sterile and wild fies when assessed at a landscape scale.en_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_US
dc.description.librarianpm2022en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHort Frontiers Fruit Fly Funden_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.nature.com/srep/index.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.citationInskeep, J.R., Allen, A.P., Taylor, P.W. et al. Canopy distribution and microclimate preferences of sterile and wild Queensland fruit flies. Scientific Reports 11, 13010 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92218-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1038/s41598-021-92218-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85875
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNature Researchen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.subjectHabitatsen_US
dc.subjectForest canopyen_US
dc.subjectSterile insectsen_US
dc.subjectFertile insectsen_US
dc.subjectWild queensland fruit fliesen_US
dc.titleCanopy distribution and microclimate preferences of sterile and wild Queensland fruit fliesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Inskeep_Canopy_2021.pdf
Size:
1.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Inskeep_CanopySuppl_2021.docx
Size:
442.99 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Supplementary information

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: