Modeling the spatial distribution of African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Kruger National Park, South Africa

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Hughes, Kristen
Fosgate, Geoffrey Theodore
Budke, Christine M.
Ward, Michael P.
Kerry, Ruth
Ingram, Ben

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Abstract

The population density of wildlife reservoirs contributes to disease transmission risk for domestic animals. The objective of this study was to model the African buffalo distribution of the Kruger National Park. A secondary objective was to collect field data to evaluate models and determine environmental predictors of buffalo detection. Spatial distribution models were created using buffalo census information and archived data from previous research. Field data were collected during the dry (August 2012) and wet (January 2013) seasons using a random walk design. The fit of the prediction models were assessed descriptively and formally by calculating the root mean square error (rMSE) of deviations from field observations. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effects of environmental variables on the detection of buffalo herds and linear regression was used to identify predictors of larger herd sizes. A zero-inflated Poisson model produced distributions that were most consistent with expected buffalo behavior. Field data confirmed that environmental factors including season (P = 0.008), vegetation type (P = 0.002), and vegetation density (P = 0.010) were significant predictors of buffalo detection. Bachelor herds were more likely to be detected in dense vegetation (P = 0.005) and during the wet season (P = 0.022) compared to the larger mixed-sex herds. Static distribution models for African buffalo can produce biologically reasonable results but environmental factors have significant effects and therefore could be used to improve model performance. Accurate distribution models are critical for the evaluation of disease risk and to model disease transmission.

Description

S1 Fig. a) Disaggregation model predictions (upper left); b) Poisson kriging model predictions (upper right); c) Zero-inflated Poisson model predictions (lower left); d) Conditional autoregression model predictions (lower right).
S1 Table. The comparison of quantitative variables between locations where buffalo were observed in Kruger National Park during August 2012 and January 2013 compared to hourly (non-buffalo) observations and the correlation of these variables with the observed herd sizes.
S2 Table. Univariate logistic regression to identify predictors of observing buffalo herds based on field data collected for 105 detected herds of buffalo in Kruger National Park during August 2012 and January 2013 compared to 234 hourly time points without buffalo observations.
S3 Table. Univariate logistic regression to identify predictors of observing bachelor herds in 104 herds of buffalo in Kruger National Park identified during August 2012 and January 2013.
S4 Table. Univariate linear regression for the estimation of effects of predictor variables on observed buffalo herd size in 104 herds of buffalo in Kruger National Park identified during August 2012 and January 2013.
S1 Code. WinBUGS code for performing the conditional autoregressive (CAR) model.
S1 File. Collected field data saved as comma separated file.

Keywords

Environmental factors, Disease risk, African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), Kruger National Park (KNP), Kruger National Park (South Africa), Distribution, Buffalo detection, Boundary, Habitat, Patterns, Selection, Wildlife, Group size, Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), Mouth diseases

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG-02: Zero hunger
SDG-03: Good health and well-being
SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities
SDG-15: Life on land

Citation

Hughes K, Fosgate GT, Budke CM, Ward MP, Kerry R, Ingram B (2017) Modeling the spatial distribution of African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0182903. https://DOI.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0182903.