The diverse socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching

dc.contributor.authorDenner, Candice
dc.contributor.authorClements, Hayley S.
dc.contributor.authorChild, Matthew F.
dc.contributor.authorDe Vos, Alta
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-10T06:22:33Z
dc.date.available2024-12-10T06:22:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: All figures and tables in this study relate to the dataset collected via surveys, as described in the methods. As we are bound by ethical considerations of the sensitivity of the data and committed to honour the trust placed in us by respondents to keep their data confidential, we cannot post the dataset publicly. We are, however, similarly committed to transparent and open science, and anonymized data with all identifying details removed can be requested from the corresponding authors for the purpose of validating our results independently, on the condition of signing a non-disclosure agreement.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe expansion of wildlife ranching has been broadly linked to conservation benefits, job creation, and economic contributions. However, a more nuanced understanding of the socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching accounting for the enterprise diversity in the sector remains a major limitation to assessing its potential to contribute to sustainable development. We assessed several important socioeconomic contributions of diverse wildlife-based business models, defined by their main revenue-generating activities, within the South African wildlife ranching industry, and the financial viability of these models. Owners and managers of privately-owned wildlife ranches and conventional agricultural farms (for comparative purposes) were interviewed in the Eastern Cape (112 ranches; 24 farms) and Limpopo provinces (152 ranches; 4 farms). We used a hierarchical clustering analysis to delineate six wildlife ranching business models. These included three more specialized models: ecotourism, trophy hunting, and wildlife breeding, and three more mixed models: mixed hunting (i.e., both meat and trophy hunting), mixed wildlife-agriculture, and trophy hunting-game meat. In general, ecotourism-focused ranches employed more people in total and per hectare (median = 23 jobs; 0.008/ha), and a higher proportion of women and skilled employees (41% and 45% of employees, respectively) than the other ranching models (median = 7–21 jobs; 0.002–0.005/ha) and conventional agriculture (median = 12 jobs; 0.004/ha). Trophy hunting-focused ranches employed the second highest number of people per hectare (0.006) although on average, a third of these jobs were seasonal. Trophy hunting ranches tended to be more profitable (median profit margin = 33%) than ecotourism (−10%), wildlife breeding (0%) and mixed-hunting (12%) ranches, though ecotourism ranches showed very high variability (interquartile range = −32% to 14%). These findings advance our understanding of the distinct socioeconomic contributions of diverse wildlife ranches, which benefits policy discourse and implementation surrounding the industry, promoting improved industry sustainability and inclusive growth.en_US
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Instituteen_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-08:Decent work and economic growthen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-15:Life on landen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe WILDTRUST Sustainable Use bursary; UCT Masters Research Scholarship; Agence Française de Développement; Kone Foundation; Jennifer Ward Oppenheimer Research Grant and Rhodes University Council Grant.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/25784854en_US
dc.identifier.citationDenner, C., Clements, H.S., Child, M.F. & De Vos, A. (2024). The diverse socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching. Conservation Science and Practice, 6(7), e13166. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13166.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2578-4854 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1111/csp2.13166
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/99837
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Open Access. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness modelsen_US
dc.subjectDiversificationen_US
dc.subjectGame ranchingen_US
dc.subjectSocioeconomic contributionsen_US
dc.subjectWildlife economyen_US
dc.subjectSDG-08: Decent work and economic growthen_US
dc.subjectSDG-15: Life on landen_US
dc.titleThe diverse socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranchingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Denner_Diverse_2024.pdf
Size:
6.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: