The diverse socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Denner, Candice
Clements, Hayley S.
Child, Matthew F.
De Vos, Alta

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Abstract

The expansion of wildlife ranching has been broadly linked to conservation benefits, job creation, and economic contributions. However, a more nuanced understanding of the socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching accounting for the enterprise diversity in the sector remains a major limitation to assessing its potential to contribute to sustainable development. We assessed several important socioeconomic contributions of diverse wildlife-based business models, defined by their main revenue-generating activities, within the South African wildlife ranching industry, and the financial viability of these models. Owners and managers of privately-owned wildlife ranches and conventional agricultural farms (for comparative purposes) were interviewed in the Eastern Cape (112 ranches; 24 farms) and Limpopo provinces (152 ranches; 4 farms). We used a hierarchical clustering analysis to delineate six wildlife ranching business models. These included three more specialized models: ecotourism, trophy hunting, and wildlife breeding, and three more mixed models: mixed hunting (i.e., both meat and trophy hunting), mixed wildlife-agriculture, and trophy hunting-game meat. In general, ecotourism-focused ranches employed more people in total and per hectare (median = 23 jobs; 0.008/ha), and a higher proportion of women and skilled employees (41% and 45% of employees, respectively) than the other ranching models (median = 7–21 jobs; 0.002–0.005/ha) and conventional agriculture (median = 12 jobs; 0.004/ha). Trophy hunting-focused ranches employed the second highest number of people per hectare (0.006) although on average, a third of these jobs were seasonal. Trophy hunting ranches tended to be more profitable (median profit margin = 33%) than ecotourism (−10%), wildlife breeding (0%) and mixed-hunting (12%) ranches, though ecotourism ranches showed very high variability (interquartile range = −32% to 14%). These findings advance our understanding of the distinct socioeconomic contributions of diverse wildlife ranches, which benefits policy discourse and implementation surrounding the industry, promoting improved industry sustainability and inclusive growth.

Description

DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: All figures and tables in this study relate to the dataset collected via surveys, as described in the methods. As we are bound by ethical considerations of the sensitivity of the data and committed to honour the trust placed in us by respondents to keep their data confidential, we cannot post the dataset publicly. We are, however, similarly committed to transparent and open science, and anonymized data with all identifying details removed can be requested from the corresponding authors for the purpose of validating our results independently, on the condition of signing a non-disclosure agreement.

Keywords

Business models, Diversification, Game ranching, Socioeconomic contributions, Wildlife economy, SDG-08: Decent work and economic growth, SDG-15: Life on land

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG-08:Decent work and economic growth
SDG-15:Life on land

Citation

Denner, C., Clements, H.S., Child, M.F. & De Vos, A. (2024). The diverse socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching. Conservation Science and Practice, 6(7), e13166. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13166.