Size, shape and maintenance matter : a critical appraisal of a global carnivore conflict mitigation strategy – livestock protection kraals in northern Botswana

dc.contributor.authorWeise, Florian Johannes
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Matt W.
dc.contributor.authorAguirre, Rocky Casillas
dc.contributor.authorTomeletso, Mathata
dc.contributor.authorGadimang, Phemelo
dc.contributor.authorSomers, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorStein, Andrew B.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-26T11:42:14Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.descriptionAppendix 1. Mean daily cattle net displacement in northern Botswana in 2017.en_ZA
dc.descriptionAppendix 2. Details of fortified livestock protection kraals and traditional kraal control groups in northern Botswana.en_ZA
dc.descriptionAppendix 3. Cost details for fortified livestock protection kraals in northern Botswana.en_ZA
dc.descriptionAppendix 4. GLM model output for monthly use of fortified livestock protection kraals in northern Botswana.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractFortified kraals are predator-proof enclosures designed to protect livestock at night. Globally, they show great promise in reducing depredation by carnivores, thus promoting co-existence with people. Their efficacy depends on effectiveness, durability, regular use, owner satisfaction, cost-efficiency, and design. We monitored 32 fortified kraals for 18 months in a high conflict area in northern Botswana (n = 427 kraal months) where lions (Panthera leo) frequently kill cattle. Monthly kraal use was 60% and was significantly influenced by kraal type, age, and shape. When used and maintained, kraals stopped livestock depredation. Due to poor maintenance, however, kraal age had a significant, negative influence on kraal use and effectiveness, compromising sustainability and cost-effectiveness. Fortified kraals built by a non-governmental organisation cost US$1322.36 per unit (n = 20) and mitigated a mean annual loss of $187.32. This suggests cost-recuperation after 7.0 years, or 2.3 times longer than observed kraal lifetime. Conversely, owner-built replicates cost $579.90 per unit (n = 4), recuperating investment after 3.1 years. Owner satisfaction was significantly higher for fortified kraals when compared with traditional kraals. However, owners of fortified kraals did not kraal their cattle more frequently than owners of traditional kraals. Regionally, the mean annual kraaling rate for 29 GPS-monitored cattle herds (n = 3360 nights) was 40%, leaving cattle vulnerable to depredation, and highlighting the importance of promoting vigilant herding together with kraaling to prevent losses. This combination could reduce regional livestock losses by 80%, or >$38,000 annually, however, kraal fortification alone does not provide a blanket solution to carnivore conflicts in Africa's agro-pastoral landscapes.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentCentre for Wildlife Managementen_ZA
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Instituteen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2019-09-01
dc.description.librarianhj2018en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Geographic Big Cats Initiative [grant numbers: B5-15, B10-16, B6-17], WWF's 2017 INNO fund, and Stichting SPOTS Netherlands and its supporters. MJS was supported by a National Research Foundation Incentive grant.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/bioconen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWeise, F.J., Hayward, M.W., Casillas Aguirre, R. et al. 2018, 'Size, shape and maintenance matter : a critical appraisal of a global carnivore conflict mitigation strategy – livestock protection kraals in northern Botswana', Biological Conservation, vol. 225, pp. 88-97.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1873-2917 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/65999
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, vol. 225, pp. 88-97, 2018. doi : 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.023.en_ZA
dc.subjectImpact assessmenten_ZA
dc.subjectHuman-wildlife conflicten_ZA
dc.subjectKraalen_ZA
dc.subjectEfficacyen_ZA
dc.subjectConflict mitigationen_ZA
dc.subjectLion (Panthera leo)en_ZA
dc.subjectLivestock protectionen_ZA
dc.subjectConservation interventionen_ZA
dc.subjectBotswanaen_ZA
dc.titleSize, shape and maintenance matter : a critical appraisal of a global carnivore conflict mitigation strategy – livestock protection kraals in northern Botswanaen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Weise_Size_2018.pdf
Size:
630.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Weise_SizeAppendix1_2018.xlsx
Size:
14.99 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Appendix 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Weise_SizeAppendix2_2018.xlsx
Size:
21.14 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Appendix 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Weise_SizeAppendix3_2018.xlsx
Size:
15.13 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Appendix 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Weise_SizeAppendix4_2018.xlsx
Size:
240.48 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Appendix 4

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: