Monitoring and evaluation practice standards in South African Social Work and Criminology

dc.contributor.advisorTerblanche, Lourieen
dc.contributor.coadvisorSteyn, Francoisen
dc.contributor.emailhlobo69@gmail.comen
dc.contributor.postgraduateCaleni, Hlobokazien
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-11T11:55:57Z
dc.date.available2017-10-11T11:55:57Z
dc.date.created2017-09-06en
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.descriptionMini Dissertation (MSW)--University of Pretoria, 2017.en
dc.description.abstractEmployee Assistance Programmes are considered to have grown immensely since an EAP was first introduced in 1986 and formally structured (EAPA-SA, 2010). The first EAPA-SA standards document was developed in 1999 and revised in 2005 and 2010 to ensure it reflects local and international best practices. The goal of the study was to explore the EAP practices of EAPA-SA members benchmarked against EAPA-SA standards. A survey was conducted by a group of students with EAP professionals, specifically registered as EAPA-SA members in 2014, under the supervision of Prof. L. S. Terblanche. The researcher identified the need to benchmark existing EAP practices against the EAPA-SA Standards document to assess whether these practices fulfil their purpose. The research focused on assessing the Monitoring and Evaluation standards of EAPs as applied in SA practices, benchmarked against EAPA-SA standards. The findings reveal less than half of respondents confirmed the existence of a monitoring and evaluation strategy in their practices. Less than half confirmed that monitoring is performed by their EAPs. Evaluation responses were alarming, as few confirmed evaluation of their EAPs. EAP core technologies are also covered by but a few respondents. Internal EAP practitioners were identified as the main persons responsible for monitoring and evaluation. Low percentages of respondents confirmed carrying out EAP evaluations. Avoidance of monitoring and evaluation may be due to anxieties and embarrassment that could arise from any negative findings of the EAP. It is crucial to engage outside, trained evaluators for programme monitoring and evaluation for the purpose of objective programme evaluation.en_ZA
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden
dc.description.degreeMSWen
dc.description.departmentSocial Work and Criminologyen
dc.identifier.citationCaleni, HH 2017, Monitoring and evaluation practice standards in South African Social Work and Criminology, MSW Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/62671>en
dc.identifier.otherS2017en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/62671
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoriaen
dc.rights© 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.en
dc.subjectUCTDen
dc.titleMonitoring and evaluation practice standards in South African Social Work and Criminologyen_ZA
dc.typeMini Dissertationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Caleni_Monitoring_2017.pdf
Size:
2.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mini Dissertation