Diagnosis of food allergy : history, examination and in vivo and in vitro tests

dc.contributor.authorVan der Spuy, D.A.
dc.contributor.authorTerblanche, Alta J.
dc.contributor.authorKarabus, S.
dc.contributor.authorKriel, M.
dc.contributor.authorManjra, Ahmed I.
dc.contributor.authorGoddard, E.
dc.contributor.authorGray, Claudia L.
dc.contributor.authorLang, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorRisenga, Samuel Malamulele
dc.contributor.authorLevin, M.E.
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-24T10:03:27Z
dc.date.available2015-02-24T10:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-01
dc.description.abstractOne cannot depend on one single test to diagnose food allergy. A detailed history is an essential initial step in cases of suspected food allergy. Aspects of the history should be gathered separately for each food being considered, as a patient may experience different types of reactions with various foods, each of which requires individual diagnostic and management strategies. History alone is not diagnostic and additional measures of sensitisation or food challenges are often required. In suspected immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy, skin-prick tests (SPTs) and/or measurement of serum specific IgE antibodies (ImmunoCAP) to suspected foods is used to prove sensitisation. Sensitisation does not, however, confirm clinical food allergy as these tests indicate an immunological response to the specific allergen, but the diagnosis requires a clear correlation between the test result and clinical reaction (by positive history or food challenge). The magnitude of the test result (SPT mean wheal size or ImmunoCAP level in kU/L) correlates with the likelihood of clinical allergy, but not the severity of a reaction. Choice of the allergens tested should be guided by the history, but limited to the lowest necessary number to avoid false-positive results. Tests for sensitisation to foods should not be performed when the history indicates that such foods are tolerated. Ninety-five per cent positive predictive values (where a clinical reaction can be predicted in 95% of cases) have been described for immediate reactions, but may be population specific. There are no validated tests to confirm non-IgE- or mixed IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies. Diagnosis of this group of allergies depends on elimination of the suspected food, clearance of symptoms, and recurrence of symptoms on re-introduction of the food.en_ZA
dc.description.librarianhb2015en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.samj.org.zaen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationVan der Spuy, DA, Terblanche, AJ, Karabus, S, Kriel, M, Manjra, AI, Goddard, E, Gray, CL, Lang, AC, Risenga, SM & Levin, ME 2015, 'Diagnosis of food allergy : history, examination and in vivo and in vitro tests', South African Medical Journal, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 69-70. len_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0256-9574 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2078-5135 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.7196/SAMJ.9100
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/43805
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherHealth and Medical Publishing Groupen_ZA
dc.rights© 2015 Health & Medical Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 3.0).en_ZA
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_ZA
dc.subjectFood allergyen_ZA
dc.subjectHistoryen_ZA
dc.subjectExaminationen_ZA
dc.subjectIn vivo testsen_ZA
dc.subjectIn vitro testsen_ZA
dc.titleDiagnosis of food allergy : history, examination and in vivo and in vitro testsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VanDerSpuy_Diagnosis_2014.pdf
Size:
106.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: