Inter- and intraclass correlations for three standard foot radiographic measurements for plantar surface angles. Which measure is most reliable?

dc.contributor.authorHohmann, Erik
dc.contributor.authorMyburgh, Jolandie
dc.contributor.authorKeough, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorTetsworth, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorGlatt, Vaida
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-15T10:46:29Z
dc.date.issued2019-10
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of three commonly used radiographic measures for plantar surface angles. METHODS : The calcaneal angle (CA), calcaneal pitch angle (CPA), and length-height index (LHI) was measured by three independent examiners on two occasions on lateral foot radiographs. Intra- and inter-rater correlations were calculated using a general linear estimate model and post-hoc tests for repeated measures. Bland–Altman’s plots with limits of agreement were used for observer differences in scores. RESULTS : The intra-class correlations for the CA ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, for the CPA from 0.93 to 0.98, and for the LHI from 0.96 to 0.97. The inter-class correlations were 0.80 for CA, 0.83 for CPA and 0.93 for LHI. CONCLUSIONS : The results of this study strongly suggest that the length-height index was the most consistent and reliable measure for arch height. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE : Diagnostic Level II, validity.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentAnatomyen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2020-10-01
dc.description.librarianhj2019en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/fasen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationHohmann, E., Myburgh, J., Keough, N. et al. 2019, 'Inter- and intraclass correlations for three standard foot radiographic measurements for plantar surface angles. Which measure is most reliable?', Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 646-653.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1268-7731 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1460-958 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.fas.2018.07.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/72321
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Foot and Ankle Society. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Foot and Ankle Surgery, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 646-653, 2019. doi : 10.1016/j.fas.2018.07.007.en_ZA
dc.subjectArch heighten_ZA
dc.subjectRadiological arch measuresen_ZA
dc.subjectMotionen_ZA
dc.subjectFlatfooten_ZA
dc.subjectAlignmenten_ZA
dc.subjectValidityen_ZA
dc.subjectAgreementen_ZA
dc.subjectReliabilityen_ZA
dc.subjectFoot posture indexen_ZA
dc.subjectLength-height index (LHI)en_ZA
dc.subjectCalcaneal angle (CA)en_ZA
dc.subjectCalcaneal pitch angle (CPA)en_ZA
dc.subject.otherHealth sciences articles SDG-03
dc.subject.otherSDG-03: Good health and well-being
dc.titleInter- and intraclass correlations for three standard foot radiographic measurements for plantar surface angles. Which measure is most reliable?en_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hohmann_Inter_2019.pdf
Size:
334.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: