Reckless trading and building contracts
dc.contributor.author | Gerber, S.C. (Sarita) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-27T09:08:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.description.abstract | In McLuckie v Sullivan 2011 1 SA 365 (GSJ) is artikel 424(1) van die Maatskappywet 61 van 1973 as remedie toegepas. Die hof het bevind dat die direkteur persoonlik aanspreeklik gehou kan word vir terugbetaling van die eisbedrag. Die bedrag is betaal as skikking vir L opeis- en betaalbare bedrag vir bouwerk wat ingevolge L bou-ooreenkoms voltooi is. Die doel van hierdie aantekening is om te bepaal of artikel 424(1) die geskikte remedie was aangesien die eiser geen skade of verlies gely het nie. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Mercantile Law | en_ZA |
dc.description.embargo | 2016-12-31 | |
dc.description.librarian | am2016 | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | rz2025 | |
dc.description.sdg | SDG-08: Decent work and economic growth | en |
dc.description.sdg | SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure | en |
dc.description.sdg | SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions | en |
dc.description.uri | http://www.lexisnexis.co.za | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Gerber, SC 2016, 'Reckless trading and building contracts', Journal of Contemporary Roman Dutch Law / Tydskrif Vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 121-128. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1682-4490 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/57524 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | LexisNexis | en_ZA |
dc.rights | LexisNexis | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Building contracts | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Bou-ooreenkomste | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Reckless trading | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Roekelose bestuur | en_ZA |
dc.subject.other | Law articles SDG-08 | en |
dc.subject.other | Law articles SDG-09 | en |
dc.subject.other | Law articles SDG-16 | en |
dc.title | Reckless trading and building contracts | en_ZA |
dc.title.alternative | Roekelose bestuur en bou-ooreenkomste | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |