A proposal towards a rational classification of the antimicrobial activity of acetone tree leaf extracts in a search for new antimicrobials

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Eloff, Jacobus Nicolaas

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag

Abstract

Many scientists investigate the potential of finding new antibiotics from plants, leading to more than a thousand publications per year. Many different minimum inhibitory concentrations of extracts have been proposed to decide if an extract has interesting activity that could lead to the discovery of a new antibiotic. To date, no rational explanation has been given for the selection criteria different authors have used. The cumulative percentage of plant extracts with different activities from a large experiment determining the activity of 714 acetone tree leaf extracts of 537 different South African tree species against 4 nosocomial pathogenic bacteria and 2 yeasts was calculated using a widely accepted serial dilution microplate method with p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet as indicator of growth. All the extracts were active at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL. The formula, % of active extracts = 439 × minimum inhibitory concentration in mg/mL1.5385, describes the results for minimum inhibitory concentrations below 0.16 mg/mL, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998. A rational approach could be to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations of the most active 1, 3, 9, 25, 50, and > 50% of a large number of plant extracts investigated against these six important microbial pathogens. Starting with an extract concentration of 10 mg/mL, I propose the following classification based on minimum inhibitory concentrations: outstanding activity < 0.02 mg/mL, excellent activity 0.021 – 0.04 mg/mL, very good activity 041 – 0.08 mg/mL, good activity 0.081 – 0.16 mg/mL, average activity 0.161 – 0.32 mg/mL, and weak activity > 0.32 mg/mL. Higher minimum inhibitory concentrations may still be effective in ethnopharmacological studies.Many scientists investigate the potential of finding new antibiotics from plants, leading to more than a thousand publications per year. Many different minimum inhibitory concentrations of extracts have been proposed to decide if an extract has interesting activity that could lead to the discovery of a new antibiotic. To date, no rational explanation has been given for the selection criteria different authors have used. The cumulative percentage of plant extracts with different activities from a large experiment determining the activity of 714 acetone tree leaf extracts of 537 different South African tree species against 4 nosocomial pathogenic bacteria and 2 yeasts was calculated using a widely accepted serial dilution microplate method with p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet as indicator of growth. All the extracts were active at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL. The formula, % of active extracts = 439 × minimum inhibitory concentration in mg/mL1.5385, describes the results for minimum inhibitory concentrations below 0.16 mg/mL, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998. A rational approach could be to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations of the most active 1, 3, 9, 25, 50, and > 50% of a large number of plant extracts investigated against these six important microbial pathogens. Starting with an extract concentration of 10 mg/mL, I propose the following classification based on minimum inhibitory concentrations: outstanding activity < 0.02 mg/mL, excellent activity 0.021 – 0.04 mg/mL, very good activity 041 – 0.08 mg/mL, good activity 0.081 – 0.16 mg/mL, average activity 0.161 – 0.32 mg/mL, and weak activity > 0.32 mg/mL. Higher minimum inhibitory concentrations may still be effective in ethnopharmacological studies.

Description

Keywords

Antimicrobial, Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), Tree leaves

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Eloff, J.N. 2021, 'A proposal towards a rational classification of the antimicrobial activity of acetone tree leaf extracts in a search for new antimicrobials', Planta Medica, vol. 87, no. 10/11, pp. 836-840, DOI: 10.1055/a-1482-1410.