From a long‑distance threat to the invasion front : a review of the invasive Aedes mosquito species in Belgium between 2007 and 2020
Loading...
Date
Authors
Deblauwe, Isra
De Wolf, Katrien
De Witte, Jacobus
Schneider, Anna
Verle, Ingrid
Vanslembrouck, Adwine
Smitz, Nathalie
Demeulemeester, Julie
Van Loo, Thomas
Dekoninck, Wouter
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BMC
Abstract
Invasive mosquito species (IMS) and their associated mosquito-borne diseases are emerging in Europe. In Belgium,
the first detection of Aedes albopictus (Skuse 1894) occurred in 2000 and of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald
1901) in 2002. Early detection and control of these IMS at points of entry (PoEs) are of paramount importance to slow
down any possible establishment. This article reviews the introductions and establishments recorded of three IMS
in Belgium based on published (2007–2014) and unpublished (2015–2020) data collected during several surveillance
projects. In total, 52 PoEs were monitored at least once for the presence of IMS between 2007 and 2020. These
included used tyre and lucky bamboo import companies, airports, ports, parking lots along highways, shelters for
imported cutting plants, wholesale markets, industrial areas, recycling areas, cemeteries and an allotment garden at
the country border with colonised areas. In general, monitoring was performed between April and November. Mosquitoes
were captured with adult and oviposition traps as well as by larval sampling. Aedes albopictus was detected
at ten PoEs, Ae. japonicus at three PoEs and Aedes koreicus (Edwards 1917) at two PoEs. The latter two species have
established overwintering populations. The percentage of PoEs positive for Ae. albopictus increased significantly over
years. Aedes albopictus is currently entering Belgium through lucky bamboo and used tyre trade and passive ground
transport, while Ae. japonicus through used tyre trade and probably passive ground transport. In Belgium, the import
through passive ground transport was first recorded in 2018 and its importance seems to be growing. Belgium is
currently at the invasion front of Ae. albopictus and Ae. japonicus. The surveillance and control management actions at
well-known PoEs associated to long-distance introductions are more straightforward than at less-defined PoEs associated
with short-distance introductions from colonised areas. These latter PoEs represent a new challenge for IMS
management in Belgium in the coming years. Aedes albopictus is expected to become established in Belgium in the
coming years, hence increasing the likelihood of local arbovirus transmission. The implementation of a sustainable,
structured and long-term IMS management programme, integrating active and passive entomological surveillance,
vector control and Public Health surveillance is therefore pivotal.
Description
Author contributions
ID drafted the manuscript and revised it after comments of all co-authors. ID,
TVL, KDW and AV carried out the mosquito identifications. ID, KDW, AS, AV, IV,
JDW, JD, TVL and WVB collected data in the field and sorted the mosquitoes in
the laboratory. WVB, ID and KDW managed the data. NS and JDW performed
the DNA barcoding. WD and AV produced the morphological reference
collection. WVB, ID, MM and RM coordinated the projects. MK performed the
statistical analysis. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors
read and approved the final manuscript.
Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file. The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the GBIF repository [44–50].
ADDITIONAL FILE 1: TABLE S1. Overview of the trapping methods used to monitor invasive mosquito species (IMS) in Belgium during the different years (and projects) and in different risk scenarios, indicating the number of traps or larval sampling visits per site and the frequency of trapping or larval sampling. TABLE S2. Aedes albopictus detections in Belgium between 2007 and 2020 at the ten points of entry (PoEs) per year including the sampling perimeter, collection and detection methods, collection (light grey) and detection (dark grey) period, control measures (X), number of individuals (total, females, males, larvae and eggs) and project. TABLE S3. Aedes japonicus detections in Belgium between 2007 and 2020 at the four points of entry (PoEs) per year including the sampling perimeter, collection and detection methods, collection (light grey) and detection (dark grey) period, the control measures (X), number of individuals (total, females, males, larvae and eggs) and project. TABLE S4. Aedes koreicus detections in Belgium between 2007 and 2020 at the two points of entry (PoEs) per year including the sampling perimeter, collection and detection methods, collection (light grey) and detection (dark grey) period, control measures (X), number of individuals (total, females, males, larvae and eggs) and project.
Data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional file. The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the GBIF repository [44–50].
ADDITIONAL FILE 1: TABLE S1. Overview of the trapping methods used to monitor invasive mosquito species (IMS) in Belgium during the different years (and projects) and in different risk scenarios, indicating the number of traps or larval sampling visits per site and the frequency of trapping or larval sampling. TABLE S2. Aedes albopictus detections in Belgium between 2007 and 2020 at the ten points of entry (PoEs) per year including the sampling perimeter, collection and detection methods, collection (light grey) and detection (dark grey) period, control measures (X), number of individuals (total, females, males, larvae and eggs) and project. TABLE S3. Aedes japonicus detections in Belgium between 2007 and 2020 at the four points of entry (PoEs) per year including the sampling perimeter, collection and detection methods, collection (light grey) and detection (dark grey) period, the control measures (X), number of individuals (total, females, males, larvae and eggs) and project. TABLE S4. Aedes koreicus detections in Belgium between 2007 and 2020 at the two points of entry (PoEs) per year including the sampling perimeter, collection and detection methods, collection (light grey) and detection (dark grey) period, control measures (X), number of individuals (total, females, males, larvae and eggs) and project.
Keywords
Aedes albopictus, Aedes japonicus japonicus, Aedes koreicus, Mosquito monitoring, Exotic mosquito species, Surveillance, Introduction pathways, Establishment, Point of entry, Culicidae, Invasive mosquito species (IMS)
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Deblauwe, I, De Wolf, K., De Witte, J. et al. 2022, 'From a long‑distance threat to the invasion front : a review of the invasive Aedes mosquito species in Belgium between 2007 and 2020', Parasites & Vectors, vol. 15, art. 206, pp. 1-17. DOI : 10.1186/s13071-022-05303-w.