Unlocking urban potential : an assessment of the limitations found within external urban connectivity networks and amenity accessibility opportunities within Tshwane’s mixed-use precincts, to determine resident suitability

Abstract

In light of South Africa's history of segregation, patterns of exclusion still exist in the urban context. Mixed-use developments have been one of the interventions in a post-apartheid context used to address these persistent historical socio-spatial barriers, by integrating a range of close residential and non-residential compatible socio-economic opportunities within the same area or parcel of land, in the hopes of fostering connected and inclusive urban environments. Though this was the intention, currently these environments still exhibit infrastructural, social, economic, and mobility challenges that hinder inclusivity. Through a quantitative comparative case study analysis conducted on mixed-use high streets within Sunnyside and Hatfield respectively, that investigates the existing external connectivity and accessibility networks. The study aims to uncover existing limitations within these networks that prevent social cohesion and impact their suitability for holistic residency. The desktop study included a macro and meso scale analysis of the precincts to situate the precincts amongst existing potential natural and infrastructural barriers, and amenity opportunities as prescribed by the CSIR sustainable settlements frameworks. In addition, observational analysis documented micro scale human engagements with soft and hard infrastructures. 20 Interviews were conducted with current residents of the respective precincts,which focused on their lived experiences of the amenity opportunities within the precinct. The study found that Hatfield’s high street and its surrounding programmes are better externally connected to the broader context of Pretoria compared to Sunnyside, due to the larger transport offerings. In terms of the amenity offerings, there is satisfaction with the offerings, as the various opportunities support the main reason for habitation, being close proximity to work,education, and affordable housing options. In addition, both precinct amenities options adhere to the CSIR prescribed requirements. Though this is the case, there are expressed desires for more health care and educational facilities in Sunnyside, and entertainment opportunities in Hatfield. Additionally, observations and interviews revealed that both precincts show a lack of hard infrastructure offerings that support informal activities like informal trade particularly in Sunnyside. However the street edges and thresholds in Hatfield facilitated more interaction and inclusion opportunities between the street, the pedestrian and the building programme than in Sunnyside. Amongst both precincts, a common concern was regarding lack of safety within the neighbourhood and the high street. Therefore, the results show a combination of negative and positive remarks. Above all else, the findings shows that the adherence to framework requirements does not promise satisfactory results, but there needs to be closer attention paid to the site and its intangible demographic specific needs to foster more inclusive multifunctional environments.