Unlocking urban potential : an assessment of the limitations found within external urban connectivity networks and amenity accessibility opportunities within Tshwane’s mixed-use precincts, to determine resident suitability
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Pretoria
Abstract
In light of South Africa's history of segregation, patterns of exclusion still exist in the urban context.
Mixed-use developments have been one of the interventions in a post-apartheid context used to
address these persistent historical socio-spatial barriers, by integrating a range of close residential
and non-residential compatible socio-economic opportunities within the same area or parcel of
land, in the hopes of fostering connected and inclusive urban environments. Though this was the
intention, currently these environments still exhibit infrastructural, social, economic, and mobility
challenges that hinder inclusivity.
Through a quantitative comparative case study analysis conducted on mixed-use high streets
within Sunnyside and Hatfield respectively, that investigates the existing external connectivity and
accessibility networks. The study aims to uncover existing limitations within these networks that
prevent social cohesion and impact their suitability for holistic residency.
The desktop study included a macro and meso scale analysis of the precincts to situate the
precincts amongst existing potential natural and infrastructural barriers, and amenity opportunities
as prescribed by the CSIR sustainable settlements frameworks. In addition, observational analysis
documented micro scale human engagements with soft and hard infrastructures. 20 Interviews
were conducted with current residents of the respective precincts,which focused on their lived
experiences of the amenity opportunities within the precinct.
The study found that Hatfield’s high street and its surrounding programmes are better externally
connected to the broader context of Pretoria compared to Sunnyside, due to the larger transport
offerings. In terms of the amenity offerings, there is satisfaction with the offerings, as the various
opportunities support the main reason for habitation, being close proximity to work,education, and
affordable housing options. In addition, both precinct amenities options adhere to the CSIR
prescribed requirements. Though this is the case, there are expressed desires for more health
care and educational facilities in Sunnyside, and entertainment opportunities in Hatfield.
Additionally, observations and interviews revealed that both precincts show a lack of hard
infrastructure offerings that support informal activities like informal trade particularly in Sunnyside.
However the street edges and thresholds in Hatfield facilitated more interaction and inclusion
opportunities between the street, the pedestrian and the building programme than in Sunnyside.
Amongst both precincts, a common concern was regarding lack of safety within the
neighbourhood and the high street. Therefore, the results show a combination of negative and
positive remarks. Above all else, the findings shows that the adherence to framework
requirements does not promise satisfactory results, but there needs to be closer attention paid to
the site and its intangible demographic specific needs to foster more inclusive multifunctional
environments.
Description
Mini Dissertation (MArch (Prof))--University of Pretoria, 2024.
Keywords
UCTD, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Mixed-use developments, Connectivity, Accessibility, Urban segregation, Resident suitability
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities
Citation
*