The role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honeybees (Apis mellifera) : honest signal or suppressive agent?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Strauss, Katrin
dc.contributor.author Scharpenberg, Holger
dc.contributor.author Crewe, Robin M.
dc.contributor.author Glahn, Felix
dc.contributor.author Foth, Heidi
dc.contributor.author Moritz, Robin F.A.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-04-30T05:30:32Z
dc.date.available 2009-04-30T05:30:32Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.description.abstract Queen pheromones interfere with worker reproduction in social insects. However, there is still an unresolved question as to whether this pheromone acts as an “honest” signal for workers, giving a reliable indication of the queen’s reproductive value, or as a suppressive agent, inhibiting worker reproduction independent of the queen’s reproductive capacity. In honeybees (Apis mellifera), the queen’s mandibular gland secretion, a mix of fatty acids and some aromatic compounds, is crucial for regulating the reproductive division of labor in the colony inhibiting ovary development in workers. We quantified the mandibular gland secretions of virgin, drone-laying, and naturally mated queens using gas chromatography to test whether the queens’ mating, ovary activation, or the reproductive value for workers correlated with the composition of the secretion. Although the absolute amounts of the “queen substance” 9-oxo-2(E)-decenoic acid (9-ODA) were similar among the three groups, the proportions of 9-ODA decreased with increasing reproductive quality. Furthermore, the ratios of queen to worker compounds were similar in all three treatment groups, irrespective of the reproductive capacity. A multivariate analysis including all six compounds could not separate drone-laying queens from naturally mated ones, both with active ovaries but only the latter ensuring colony survival. We suggest that the mandibular gland pheromones are unlikely to function as reliable indicators of queen reproductive value and rather operate as an agent to suppress worker reproduction. This does not exclude the possibility that other “honest” pheromone signals exist in the honeybee colony, but these would have to arise from other semiochemicals, which could be produced by both the queen and the brood. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Strauss, K, Scharpenberg, H, Crewe, RM, Glahn, F, Foth, H & Moritz, RFA 2008, ‘The role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honeybees (Apis mellifera) : honest signal or suppressive agent?’, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1523-1531. [http://www.springer.com/life+sci/behavioural/journal/265] en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0340-5443
dc.identifier.other 10.1007/s00265-008-0581-9
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/9801
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.rights Springer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com en_US
dc.subject Honeybee (Apis mellifera) en_US
dc.subject Queen–worker conflict en_US
dc.subject Pheromone en_US
dc.subject Fecundity en_US
dc.subject Dominance en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Honeybee -- Research
dc.subject.lcsh Bee culture -- Queen rearing
dc.subject.lcsh Insect societies
dc.title The role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honeybees (Apis mellifera) : honest signal or suppressive agent? en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record