The role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honeybees (Apis mellifera) : honest signal or suppressive agent?

dc.contributor.authorStrauss, Katrin
dc.contributor.authorScharpenberg, Holger
dc.contributor.authorCrewe, Robin M.
dc.contributor.authorGlahn, Felix
dc.contributor.authorFoth, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorMoritz, Robin F.A.
dc.date.accessioned2009-04-30T05:30:32Z
dc.date.available2009-04-30T05:30:32Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractQueen pheromones interfere with worker reproduction in social insects. However, there is still an unresolved question as to whether this pheromone acts as an “honest” signal for workers, giving a reliable indication of the queen’s reproductive value, or as a suppressive agent, inhibiting worker reproduction independent of the queen’s reproductive capacity. In honeybees (Apis mellifera), the queen’s mandibular gland secretion, a mix of fatty acids and some aromatic compounds, is crucial for regulating the reproductive division of labor in the colony inhibiting ovary development in workers. We quantified the mandibular gland secretions of virgin, drone-laying, and naturally mated queens using gas chromatography to test whether the queens’ mating, ovary activation, or the reproductive value for workers correlated with the composition of the secretion. Although the absolute amounts of the “queen substance” 9-oxo-2(E)-decenoic acid (9-ODA) were similar among the three groups, the proportions of 9-ODA decreased with increasing reproductive quality. Furthermore, the ratios of queen to worker compounds were similar in all three treatment groups, irrespective of the reproductive capacity. A multivariate analysis including all six compounds could not separate drone-laying queens from naturally mated ones, both with active ovaries but only the latter ensuring colony survival. We suggest that the mandibular gland pheromones are unlikely to function as reliable indicators of queen reproductive value and rather operate as an agent to suppress worker reproduction. This does not exclude the possibility that other “honest” pheromone signals exist in the honeybee colony, but these would have to arise from other semiochemicals, which could be produced by both the queen and the brood.en_US
dc.identifier.citationStrauss, K, Scharpenberg, H, Crewe, RM, Glahn, F, Foth, H & Moritz, RFA 2008, ‘The role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honeybees (Apis mellifera) : honest signal or suppressive agent?’, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1523-1531. [http://www.springer.com/life+sci/behavioural/journal/265]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0340-5443
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00265-008-0581-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/9801
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsSpringer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comen_US
dc.subjectHoneybee (Apis mellifera)en_US
dc.subjectQueen–worker conflicten_US
dc.subjectPheromoneen_US
dc.subjectFecundityen_US
dc.subjectDominanceen_US
dc.subject.lcshHoneybee -- Research
dc.subject.lcshBee culture -- Queen rearing
dc.subject.lcshInsect societies
dc.titleThe role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honeybees (Apis mellifera) : honest signal or suppressive agent?en_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Strauss_Role(2008).pdf
Size:
158.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: