Comparison of satellite platform for mapping the distribution of Mauritius thorn (Caesalpinia decapetala) and River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) in the Vhembe Biosphere Reserve
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Comparison of satellite platform for mapping the distribution of Mauritius thorn (Caesalpinia decapetala) and River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) in the Vhembe Biosphere Reserve
Dondofema, Farai; Nethengwe, Nthaduleni Samuel; Taylor, Peter; Ramoelo, Abel
Mapping and tracking invasive alien plant species (IAPS) and their invasiveness can be
achieved using remote sensing (RS) and geographic information systems (GIS). Continuous monitoring using RS, GIS and modelling are fundamental tools for informing invasion and management
strategies. Using systematic comparisons, we look at three remote sensing imagery platforms and
how accurately they can be classified within the Vhembe biosphere reserve, Limpopo Province, South
Africa. Supervised classification of National Geospatial Information Colour Digital Aerial Imagery,
DigitalGlobe Worldview 2 and CNES SPOT 6 was performed. The Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM)
algorithm was used to identify the best satellite for species-level classification. The accuracy of the
classifications produced an overall accuracy (OA) of 71% with a Kappa coefficient (KC) of 0.76 for
CDA photographs, an OA of 81% and a KC of 0.80 for Worldview 2, and an OA of 89% with a KC of
0.86 for SPOT 6 imagery. Therefore, SPOT 6 imagery came out as the most suitable for species-level
classification. The classification results from the SPOT 6 imagery were used as input data for further
species distribution modelling of Mauritius Thorn and River Red Gum in the VBR.
Description:
DATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: The datasets generated and analysed during this study are not publicly available as they are part of a more extensive study that is currently ongoing but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.