Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential : a comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Reddy, Tarryn Marisca
dc.contributor.author Heinze, Barbara M.
dc.contributor.author Biagio-de Jager, Leigh
dc.contributor.author Maes, Leen
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-23T07:20:46Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-23T07:20:46Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES : To compare the response rate and response parameters of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c&oVEMP) elicited by narrowband (NB) and broadband (BB) CE-Chirp, with the more classical tone burst (TB) and click VEMPs. DESIGN : The response rate, latency, amplitude and asymmetry ratio of c&oVEMPs elicited by 95 dB nHL air conducted (AC) 500 Hz NB CE-chirp, BB CE-chirp, 500 Hz TB and click stimuli were recorded bilaterally. STUDY SAMPLE : 20 male and 38 female participants (19–39 years). RESULTS : For the cVEMP, the highest response rate was found for NB chirp (100%), followed by TB (91%), BB chirp (87%) and finally click (85%). A similar order was seen for oVEMP with percentages of 100%; 57%, 57%, and 43%. The 500 Hz NB CE-Chirp elicited significantly shorter cVEMP P1 and N1 latencies and significantly larger c&oVEMP amplitudes compared to all other stimuli. BB CE-Chirp elicited significantly shorter c&oVEMP P1 and N1 latencies with smaller amplitudes compared to TB. Asymmetry ratios were not statistically significant for all comparisons. CONCLUSION : The 500 Hz NB CE-chirp provides the highest response rates, shorter latencies and larger amplitudes, and therefore seem a promising stimulus for reliably measuring c&oVEMPs in clinical practice. en_US
dc.description.department Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being en_US
dc.description.uri http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iija20 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Tarryn Marisca Reddy, Barbara Heinze, Leigh Biagio-de Jager & Leen Maes (2023) Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation, International Journal of Audiology, 62:6, 579-586, DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1499-2027 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1708-8186 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96186
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor and Francis en_US
dc.rights © 2022 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society. This is an electronic version of an article published in International Journal of Audiology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 579-586, 2023. doi : 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924. International Journal of Audiology is available online at : www.tandfonline.com/loi/iija20. en_US
dc.subject Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c&oVEMP) en_US
dc.subject Ocular VEMP en_US
dc.subject Normative data en_US
dc.subject CE-Chirp en_US
dc.subject Tone burst en_US
dc.subject Click en_US
dc.subject Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) en_US
dc.title Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential : a comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record