dc.contributor.author |
Reddy, Tarryn Marisca
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Heinze, Barbara M.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Biagio-de Jager, Leigh
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Maes, Leen
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-05-23T07:20:46Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-05-23T07:20:46Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
OBJECTIVES :
To compare the response rate and response parameters of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c&oVEMP) elicited by narrowband (NB) and broadband (BB) CE-Chirp, with the more classical tone burst (TB) and click VEMPs.
DESIGN :
The response rate, latency, amplitude and asymmetry ratio of c&oVEMPs elicited by 95 dB nHL air conducted (AC) 500 Hz NB CE-chirp, BB CE-chirp, 500 Hz TB and click stimuli were recorded bilaterally.
STUDY SAMPLE :
20 male and 38 female participants (19–39 years).
RESULTS :
For the cVEMP, the highest response rate was found for NB chirp (100%), followed by TB (91%), BB chirp (87%) and finally click (85%). A similar order was seen for oVEMP with percentages of 100%; 57%, 57%, and 43%. The 500 Hz NB CE-Chirp elicited significantly shorter cVEMP P1 and N1 latencies and significantly larger c&oVEMP amplitudes compared to all other stimuli. BB CE-Chirp elicited significantly shorter c&oVEMP P1 and N1 latencies with smaller amplitudes compared to TB. Asymmetry ratios were not statistically significant for all comparisons.
CONCLUSION :
The 500 Hz NB CE-chirp provides the highest response rates, shorter latencies and larger amplitudes, and therefore seem a promising stimulus for reliably measuring c&oVEMPs in clinical practice. |
en_US |
dc.description.department |
Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology |
en_US |
dc.description.librarian |
hj2024 |
en_US |
dc.description.sdg |
SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being |
en_US |
dc.description.uri |
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iija20 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citation |
Tarryn Marisca Reddy, Barbara Heinze, Leigh Biagio-de Jager & Leen Maes
(2023) Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation, International Journal of Audiology, 62:6, 579-586, DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1499-2027 (print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1708-8186 (online) |
|
dc.identifier.other |
10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/96186 |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Taylor and Francis |
en_US |
dc.rights |
© 2022 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society. This is an electronic version of an article published in International Journal of Audiology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 579-586, 2023. doi : 10.1080/14992027.2022.2064924. International Journal of Audiology is available online at : www.tandfonline.com/loi/iija20. |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c&oVEMP) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Ocular VEMP |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Normative data |
en_US |
dc.subject |
CE-Chirp |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Tone burst |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Click |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) |
en_US |
dc.title |
Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential : a comparison of narrowband chirp, broadband chirp, tone burst and click stimulation |
en_US |
dc.type |
Postprint Article |
en_US |