Please be advised that the site will be down for maintenance on Sunday, September 1, 2024, from 08:00 to 18:00, and again on Monday, September 2, 2024, from 08:00 to 09:00. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
dc.contributor.author | Botes, Mignon![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Van der Linde, Jeannie![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Swanepoel, De Wet![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-05T11:44:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07 | |
dc.description | DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its Supporting Information. | en_US |
dc.description | SUPPORTING INFORMATION : TABLE S1: Changes to the questions on the PEDS tools as indicated by the community. TABLE S2: Highest ranked question after round 2 of Delphi Method. TABLE S3: All the adaptations on the PEDS tools to form the PEDS tolls-SA. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION : Culturally relevant developmental screening is one of the best ways to appropriately identify developmental delays and disabilities in children as early as possible across diverse cultural backgrounds. This study aimed to adapt the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) tools for a low-income community in South Africa by using a detailed multiphased cultural and contextual adaption process. METHOD AND RESULTS : A three-phase mixed-method design relying on triangulation of data was used. Data were collected at an immunization clinic in a low-income community in Mamelodi, South Africa. Phase 1 was a focus group discussion with 11 community participants. The topics explored the possible changes to the PEDS tools to make them more relevant to the community. Phase 1 informed Phase 2 where 12 early childhood development experts achieved consensus through a two-round survey on a modified Delphi method. In Phase 3, a draft of the PEDS tools-SA was presented to the authors of the PEDS tools for final approval. Of 55 questions that were adapted for the PEDS tools-SA, two original questions (3.6%), 14 questions from the expert suggestions (25.4%) and 39 from the community participant's suggestions (71%) were included. A final version of the PEDS tools-SA was created. CONCLUSION : This study used a systematic method to adapt the PEDS tools to create the culturally appropriate PEDS tool-SA for a low-income community in South Africa, informed by community stakeholders' views from the first step. This resulted in a high-quality adaptation process that is more likely to result in a tool that is more acceptable to caregivers from a low-income South African community. KEY MESSAGES : A culturally appropriate developmental screening tool was culturally and linguistically adapted for a low-income community in South Africa. A systematic method for culturally adapting a screening tool was used in this study. Community participants from a low-income community and experts in ECD informed the changes to the developmental screening tool. | en_US |
dc.description.department | Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology | en_US |
dc.description.embargo | 2023-11-24 | |
dc.description.librarian | hj2023 | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/cch | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Botes, M., Van der Linde, J., & Swanepoel, D.W. (2023). A multiphased cultural and contextual adaptation of the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status tools for a low-income community: A South African case study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 49(4), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13083. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0305-1862 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2214 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1111/cch.13083 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/91282 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article : A multiphased cultural and contextual adaptation of the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status tools for a low-income community: A South African case study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 49(4), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13083. The definite version is available at : http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/cch. | en_US |
dc.subject | Community involvement | en_US |
dc.subject | Cultural and contextual adaptation | en_US |
dc.subject | Cultural appropriateness | en_US |
dc.subject | Low-income community | en_US |
dc.subject | PEDS tools | en_US |
dc.subject | Parents' evaluation of developmental status (PEDS) | en_US |
dc.subject | South Africa (SA) | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG-04: Quality education | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG-10: Reduced inequalities | en_US |
dc.title | A multiphased cultural and contextual adaptation of the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status tools for a low-income community : a South African case study | en_US |
dc.type | Postprint Article | en_US |