Assessing reproductive performance to establish benchmarks for small-holder beef cattle herds in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nkadimeng, Marble
dc.contributor.author Van Marle-Koster, Este
dc.contributor.author Nengovhela, Nkhanedzeni Baldwin
dc.contributor.author Ramukhithi, Fhulufhelo Vincent
dc.contributor.author Mphaphathi, Masindi Lotus
dc.contributor.author Rust, Johannes Matthias
dc.contributor.author Makgahlela, Mahlako Linah
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-05T13:08:19Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-05T13:08:19Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11-01
dc.description SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: TABLE S1: Summary of the likelihood and variation of reproductive performance in smallholder beef cattle herds between provinces (Eastern Cape, Free State, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and North West). TABLE S2: Cow characteristics (breed, age, parity). en_US
dc.description.abstract Smallholder beef cattle farms in South Africa have had low reproductive performance, which has been associated with management practices. Considering current farm management practices, a multi-stage selection study was conducted to assess reproductive performance as defined by pregnancy rate, fetal and calf losses, calving interval and days open to benchmark reproductive performance. Data were collected twice, in autumn (March–May) for pregnancy diagnosis and in spring (September–November) for monitoring of confirmed pregnancies. Overall, 3694 cow records from 40 smallholder herds were collected during 2018 and 2019 breeding seasons from five provinces. The preferred 25th quartile described target performance and GLIMMIX procedure determined associations between management practices and performance. Smallholder farms on average recorded 50% pregnancy rate and 12% fetal and calf losses with 304 and 608 days open and calving interval, respectively. The derived target benchmarks for pregnancy rate, fetal and calf losses, days open and calving intervals in smallholder farms were 54%, 1.4%, 152 and 425 days, respectively. Reproductive performance was associated with no knowledge of body condition scoring before breeding, culling of old and non-productive cows, record keeping and low bull to cow ratio (p < 0.05). The performance benchmarks implied that industry averages may be improved if sustainable management services are provided through extension and advisory services. en_US
dc.description.department Animal and Wildlife Sciences en_US
dc.description.librarian am2023 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.mdpi.com/journal/animals en_US
dc.identifier.citation Nkadimeng, M.; Van Marle-Köster, E.; Nengovhela, N.B.; Ramukhithi, F.V.; Mphaphathi, M.L.; Rust, J.M.; Makgahlela, M.L. Assessing Reproductive Performance to Establish Benchmarks for Small- Holder Beef Cattle Herds in South Africa. Animals 2022, 12, 3003. https://DOI.org/10.3390/ani12213003. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2076-2615 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3390/ani12213003
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/90382
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.rights © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. en_US
dc.subject Cow fertility en_US
dc.subject Management factors en_US
dc.subject Performance benchmarks en_US
dc.subject Pregnancy rate en_US
dc.title Assessing reproductive performance to establish benchmarks for small-holder beef cattle herds in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record