Impact of traditional governance law's on communities rights to participate in mineral approval processes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Gerber, Leonardus J.
dc.contributor.postgraduate Masutha, Mashudu
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-02T12:24:05Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-02T12:24:05Z
dc.date.created 2023
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.description Mini Dissertation (LLM (Extractive Industry Law in Africa))--University of Pretoria, 2022. en_US
dc.description.abstract The growth of mining situated in traditional communities, and the traditional governance laws has left those most affected by mineral operations behind. This paper illustrates that the mining laws and customary land rights in South Africa provide the right to meaningful engagement and consent in mineral approval processes to local communities. However, as this research explains, the ability for local communities to exercise these rights is limited given the enactment of the Traditional Leadership Khoi- San Act which enables traditional leadership structures to unilaterally consent on the local communities behalf. The research analyses the implication of this by focusing on the Amadiba people (Umgungundlovu mining community in Xolobeni in particular) in the Eastern Cape as case a study. This case study involves the local community against a proposal for open cast mining on their land and withholding consent under customary law, while traditional leaders in support of the application thereby providing consent under traditional governance laws. The analysis showcases the key determinants within traditional authorities when local community are exercising participation rights, and the fundamental role of customary law. This research explores the relationship between traditional governance legal frameworks and customary law through examining the jurisprudence and the subsequent codification of customary laws. The findings reveal the emphasis of democratisation of traditional governance and Ubuntu as foundational principles of customary law. This interpretation empowers local communities to participation rights even where traditional governance laws depart or limits this empowerment. This research demonstrates a misalignment between traditional governance laws and customary laws has far-reaching implications for the local communities to participate in mineral approvals processes, and the broader operability of the mineral licensing. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree LLM (Extractive Industry Law in Africa) en_US
dc.description.department Public Law en_US
dc.identifier.citation * en_US
dc.identifier.other A2023
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89937
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Traditional governance en_US
dc.subject Traditional Khoi-San Leadership Act en_US
dc.subject Mineral approvals en_US
dc.subject Meaningful engagement en_US
dc.subject Ubuntu en_US
dc.subject Customary law en_US
dc.title Impact of traditional governance law's on communities rights to participate in mineral approval processes en_US
dc.type Mini Dissertation en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record