Impact of traditional governance law's on communities rights to participate in mineral approval processes

dc.contributor.advisorGerber, Leonardus J.
dc.contributor.emailmashudumasutha@yahoo.comen_US
dc.contributor.postgraduateMasutha, Mashudu
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T12:24:05Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T12:24:05Z
dc.date.created2023
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionMini Dissertation (LLM (Extractive Industry Law in Africa))--University of Pretoria, 2022.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe growth of mining situated in traditional communities, and the traditional governance laws has left those most affected by mineral operations behind. This paper illustrates that the mining laws and customary land rights in South Africa provide the right to meaningful engagement and consent in mineral approval processes to local communities. However, as this research explains, the ability for local communities to exercise these rights is limited given the enactment of the Traditional Leadership Khoi- San Act which enables traditional leadership structures to unilaterally consent on the local communities behalf. The research analyses the implication of this by focusing on the Amadiba people (Umgungundlovu mining community in Xolobeni in particular) in the Eastern Cape as case a study. This case study involves the local community against a proposal for open cast mining on their land and withholding consent under customary law, while traditional leaders in support of the application thereby providing consent under traditional governance laws. The analysis showcases the key determinants within traditional authorities when local community are exercising participation rights, and the fundamental role of customary law. This research explores the relationship between traditional governance legal frameworks and customary law through examining the jurisprudence and the subsequent codification of customary laws. The findings reveal the emphasis of democratisation of traditional governance and Ubuntu as foundational principles of customary law. This interpretation empowers local communities to participation rights even where traditional governance laws depart or limits this empowerment. This research demonstrates a misalignment between traditional governance laws and customary laws has far-reaching implications for the local communities to participate in mineral approvals processes, and the broader operability of the mineral licensing.en_US
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_US
dc.description.degreeLLM (Extractive Industry Law in Africa)en_US
dc.description.departmentPublic Lawen_US
dc.identifier.citation*en_US
dc.identifier.otherA2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89937
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectUCTDen_US
dc.subjectTraditional governanceen_US
dc.subjectTraditional Khoi-San Leadership Acten_US
dc.subjectMineral approvalsen_US
dc.subjectMeaningful engagementen_US
dc.subjectUbuntuen_US
dc.subjectCustomary lawen_US
dc.titleImpact of traditional governance law's on communities rights to participate in mineral approval processesen_US
dc.typeMini Dissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Masutha_Impact_2022.pdf
Size:
685.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mini Dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: