Improving the efficiency of the digits-in-noise hearing screening test: a comparison between four different test procedures

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dambha, Tasneem
dc.contributor.author Swanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.author Mahomed-Asmail, Faheema
dc.contributor.author De Sousa, K.C. (Karina)
dc.contributor.author Graham, Marien Alet
dc.contributor.author Smits, Cas
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-22T08:54:04Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-22T08:54:04Z
dc.date.issued 2022-01
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE : This study compared the test characteristics, test-retest reliability, and test efficiency of three novel digits-in-noise (DIN) test procedures to a conventional antiphasic 23-trial adaptive DIN (D23). METHOD : One hundred twenty participants with an average age of 42 years (SD = 19) were included. Participants were tested and retested with four different DIN procedures. Three new DIN procedures were compared to the reference D23 version: (a) a self-selected DIN (DSS) to allow participants to indicate a subjective speech recognition threshold (SRT), (b) a combination of self-selected and adaptive eight-trial DIN (DC8) that utilized a self-selected signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) followed by an eight-trial adaptive DIN procedure, and (c) a fixed SNR DIN (DF) approach using a fixed SNR value for all presentations to produce a pass/fail test result. RESULTS : Test-retest reliability of the D23 procedure was better than that of the DSS and DC8 procedures. SRTs from DSS and DC8 were significantly higher than SRTs from D23. DSS was not accurate to discriminate between normal-hearing and hard of hearing listeners. The DF and DC8 procedures with an adapted cutoff showed good hearing screening test characteristics. All three novel DIN procedure durations were significantly shorter (< 70 s) than that of D23. DF showed a reduction of 46% in the number of presentations compared to D23 (from 23 presentations to an average of 12.5). CONCLUSIONS : The DF and DC8 procedures had significantly lower test durations than the reference D23 and show potential to be more time-efficient screening tools to determine normal hearing or potential hearing loss. Further studies are needed to optimize the DC8 procedure. The reference D23 remains the most reliable and accurate DIN hearing screening test, but studies in which the potentially efficient new DIN procedures are compared to pure-tone thresholds are needed to validate these procedures. en_US
dc.description.department Science, Mathematics and Technology Education en_US
dc.description.department Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2023 en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation’s grant entitled “Supra- Institutional Initiative on the Advancement of Black South Africans Within the Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences”. en_US
dc.description.uri https://pubs.asha.org/journal/jslhr en_US
dc.identifier.citation Dambha, T., Swanepoel, D.W., Mahomed-Asmail, F. et al. 2022, 'Improving the efficiency of the digits-in-noise hearing screening test: a comparison between four different test procedures', Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 378-391. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00159. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1092-4388 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1558-9102 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00159
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89754
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Speech-Language-Hearing Association en_US
dc.rights © 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association en_US
dc.subject Test–retest reliability en_US
dc.subject Test efficiency en_US
dc.subject Digits-in-noise (DIN) en_US
dc.subject Digits-in-noise hearing screening test en_US
dc.title Improving the efficiency of the digits-in-noise hearing screening test: a comparison between four different test procedures en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record